MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2052763774 · doi:10.1353/esc.2009.0047

North of Empire: Essays on the Cultural Technologies of Space (review)

2009· article· en· W2052763774 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Brooke Pratt

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTravel Writing and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEmpireNarrativeSociologyPower (physics)HistoryMedia studiesLiteratureArtArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: North of Empire: Essays on the Cultural Technologies of Space Brooke Pratt Jody Berland. North of Empire: Essays on the Cultural Technologies of Space. Durham and London: Duke UP, 2009. xiii + 386 pp. $89.95 cloth, $24.95 paper. In North of Empire: Essays on the Cultural Technologies of Space, Jody Berland creates a fruitful dialogue between cultural studies and Canadian communication theory as “intellectual traditions” that present “powerful challenges to discourses of economic rationality and technological progress” (8). Drawing on the work of Canadian communication giants such as Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan, Berland examines a wide range of social practices, media technologies, and other cultural phenomena, from the popular Molson Canadian “Rant” of 2000 to our contemporary obsession with up-to-the-minute weather forecasts, with the goal of unraveling the “hermeneutic loop” that connects space, culture, media, and empire (23). This diversity of subject matter means that the book as a whole is [End Page 138] less unified than it could be, but as Berland readily acknowledges, North of Empire contains “more than 30 percent previously published material” (4)—a fact that might account, in part, for the sometimes disjointed narrative thread between and among its nine core chapters. According to Berland’s definition, the “cultural technologies” of her title denote “the formal, phenomenological, and social properties of media technologies together with the machineries of knowledge and power through which they emerge and within which they work” (12). In short, “cultural technologies” are the very “processes and practices that comprise culture” (12), and they have a formative role in everything from “the development and transformation of national communities” to “the exploitation and management of the physical environment” (13). While Berland’s understanding of “cultural technologies” is admirably comprehensive, the concept itself as she describes it is also disconcertingly all-encompassing, in that the term may simply be too broad to be useful. At the same time, perhaps the extensive scale of so-called cultural technologies and the scope of their reach were part of Berland’s motivation for undertaking her study to begin with; indeed, North of Empire ultimately proposes that it is precisely because cultural technologies are so pervasive that they must undergo continual critical scrutiny. If we can “critique the compulsions of modernity,” says Berland, we can both “abandon the rhetoric of inevitability” that is so often attached to teleological notions of progress and avoid the associated tendency toward complacency and indifference (26). In order to resist “theorizing culture in the abstract,” Berland frames her study as the work of a self-aware scholar who “investigates the trajectory of specific cultural technologies as they mediate and alter relations between human bodies, technology, space, and empire” (11, emphasis added). Throughout the book, her probing style enacts this call for a move away from “obfuscation” in favour of a critical practice that rejects the easy conflation of “analytical” and “substantive” terminology (26). Many of her chapters include series of pointed questions and concrete examples taken from popular culture that allow readers to remain actively (and reflexively) engaged with the material at hand, and several are organized around keywords or cultural artefacts that Berland re-envisions from a perspective that deftly combines cultural studies with communication theory (see, for example, her rendering of the “49th parallel” in chapter 1). The book’s first three chapters will likely be of most interest to literature scholars, particularly those who specialize in the field of Canadian literature and culture. Chapter 1 focuses on the ways in which the border between Canada and the United States has been variously imagined, contested, [End Page 139] and reconstructed. Citing Stephen Slemon’s conception of Canada as a “Second World” nation, Berland determines that the country’s ambivalent role as both colony and colonizer has resulted in a national self-image governed largely “by the chronic questioning of its own possibility” (53). The uncertain status of Canada’s cultural identity is well-worn ground for Canadian literary critics; the originality of Berland’s contribution comes through in chapter 3 where she returns to the subject in explicitly spatial terms. As a kind of intermission between the first and third chapters and their...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,795
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,930

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetTravel Writing and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207