P2-12-28: Studies of a Malignancy-Associated Protein, Osteopontin, in NCIC CTG MA.14, a Randomized Trial of Tamoxifen Versus Combined Tamoxifen and Octreotide LAR in Adjuvant Treatment of Women with Early Breast Cancer.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background We have shown, in women with metastatic breast cancer (BC), that high baseline plasma osteopontin (OPN) levels and increases over time are associated with poor survival. In primary BC, increased immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of OPN in tumour is associated with poorer survival and is elevated in lymph node metastases relative to primary tumour. Our current study evaluates tumour and baseline/serial plasma OPN levels after resection of primary BC. Methods: In NCIC CTG MA.14, 667 postmenopausal women post surgery received 5 yrs Tamoxifen (T) +/− 2 yrs monthly Octreotide LAR. There were no differences in survival outcomes between arms. OPN was assayed by IHC in primary BC. OPN was measured in plasma at baseline (up to 4 mos post randomization) and serially in recurrent (18 mos time window) versus non-recurrent cases, by ELISA. Statistical Analysis: IHC and plasma OPN had Box-Cox variance stabilization transformations (power 0.5; logarithm). Descriptive characterization of both OPN measurements is provided for all patients, by baseline patient and tumour characteristics, and by recurrence status. Univariate stratified log-rank statistics and hazard ratios with 95% CI were generated for intention to treat (ITT), event free survival (EFS), relapse fee survival (RFS), overall survival, any bone RFS, and non-bone RFS. Stratified step-wise forward Cox regression was used, with factor added if p<0.05. Results: From 667 MA.14 patients, 647 patients were assessed for OPN: 462 (69%) by IHC; 387 (58%) at baseline in plasma (with 2,542 samples total from serial sampling). IHC % tumor positivity had mean 33.9% (95% CI 30.2%-37.9%), while baseline plasma OPN was mean 46.1 (44.6−47.6) ng/ml. In 80 women with recurrence, mean OPN during the recurrence window was 60.7 (52.8−69.8) ng/ml. Neither baseline IHC or plasma OPN levels were significantly associated with any of the endpoints in either univariate or multivariate analyses. Older age (p=0.02), greater nodal involvement (p=0.001), higher baseline body mass index (p<0.0001), and higher tumour grade (p<0.0001) were multivariately associated with shorter EFS. Baseline plasma OPN was not correlated with IHC OPN (Pearson 0.02, p=0.73). Discussion: Mean baseline OPN plasma level 46.1 ng/ml (median 45 ng/ml) in MA.14 was similar to our previous findings in healthy women (median 47 ng/ml). In contrast, we previously showed that 63% of 158 women with a new diagnosis of metastatic BC had elevated OPN levels with median value 177 ng/ml. Our results thus far suggest that tumor and plasma levels, while associated with prognosis in metastatic BC, may not be so in primary BC following surgery. However, in MA.14, the 80 women with recurrent BC had significantly higher mean OPN in the recurrence window, 60.7 ng/ml, than at baseline. We will present further analyses exploring this finding. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-28.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».