MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2053110476 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2004.0009

Defining Masculinity in A Simple Story

2004· article· en· W2053110476 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Caroline Breashears

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHEROAdventureCharacter (mathematics)Art historyReprintSimple (philosophy)MasculinityClassicsLiteratureHistoryArtPhilosophyPsychoanalysisPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Defining Masculinity in A Simple Story Caroline Breashears When A SimpleStory appeared in 1791, reviewers had no trouble identifying its moral—that women should be given "APROPER EDUCATION"—or its key interest, the priestwho inherits an earldom.' The CriticalReview names Lord Elmwood as the "one hero," while die Analytical Review notes that the reader is never "at a loss to say which is the hero of the tale."2 That hero clearly intrigued them: "Her character, the Roman Catholic lord, is perfecdy new; and she has conducted him, dirough a series of surprising and well-contrasted adventures, with a uniformity of character and truth of description that have rarelybeen surpassed," the Gentleman'sMagazineenthuses.3 The Monthly Review likewise focused on Elmwood in its summary: "To give a picture ofLord Elmwood, in all these trying circumstances, as 1 Elizabeth Inchbald, A SimpleSlory (1791; reprint, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 338. References are to this edition. During its long gestation, this article benefited from the thoughtful comments of several colleagues. I would particularly like to thankJohn O'Brien, Terry Belanger, Cynthia Wall, Patricia Meyer Spacks, and Sarah Gates for their advice and support. 2 Anon., review ofA SimpleSlory, Critical Review2nd ser., 1 (1791), 207; Mary Wollstonecraft, review of A Simple Story, Analytical Review (May 1791), in Tlte Works, ed. Janet Todd and Marilyn Buder, vol. 7 (NewYork: NewYork University Press, 1989), 370. 3 Anon., review ofA SimpleSlory, Gentleman's Magazine &3 (1791), 255. EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION, Volume 16, Number 3, April 2004 452 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION well in his conduct to his wife, who had dishonoured him, as to die daughter, who was his issue by that wife, is the main design of Mrs. Inchbald's Simple Story."4 These views ofLord Elmwood's character and centrality are rarely echoed today. Most modern readers have found him of secondary interest to Miss Milner and Matilda, whose transgressions and power struggles with Lord Elmwood have been intricately debated.5 Lord Elmwood fares poorly in these discussions, where he is often arraigned as the embodiment of patriarchal injustice.6 A notable exception is Brian McCrea's thoughtful reading ofDorriforth as "the victim of the requirements ofpatrilinear succession," a reading that returns the focus to the hero.7 For most recent readers, however, Lord Elmwood lacks the consistency and compelling interest—even sexiness—that contemporaries found. Certainly few have exclaimed, with Maria Edgeworth, "I am glad I have never metwidi a Dorriforth, for I must inevitably have fallen desperately in love with him."8 Yet to understand die response ofElizabedi Inchbald's first readers mightbe to understand somediing about diis novel and its culture. What made Lord Elmwood not only acceptable but intriguing? What cultural and aesthetic norms or issues might he have evoked in die 1790s? One answer is suggested by recent studies ofmasculinity, a concept in transition in Georgian England. As GJ. Barker-Benfield, Tim Fulford, and others have shown, many eighteenth-century writers were attempting to negotiate a masculine ideal that steered between 4 Anon., review of? SimpleSlory, Monthly Review ìnd ser., 4 (January-April 1791), 436. 5 This debate is evident in the works of, for example, Terry Castle, Masqueradeand Civilization: Tlte Camivalesque in Eighteenth-Century English Culture and Fiction (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986), Patricia MeyerSpacks, Desireand Truth: Functions ofPlot in EigliteenthCenturyEnglish Novels (Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1990), and EleanorTy, Unsex'd Revolutionaries:Five Women Novelists oftlte 1790s (Toronto: University ofToronto Press, 1993). 6 See, for example, George E. Haggerty, "Female Abjection in Inchbald's A SimpleStory," SEL 36 (1996), 655-71; Ben P. Robertson, "The Male Self Redefined: Education and the Feminized Man in the Marquis de Sade'sJustine and Elizabeth Inchbald's A Simple Story," University of Tulsa Graduate Review [online journal], 3 (2001). Available from www.utulsa.edu/tugr/Sadelnchbald.htm; INTERNET (accessed 29January 2004). 7 Brian McCrea, Impotent Fathers: PatriarchyandDemographic Crisis in tlteEigliteentli-CenturyNovel (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1998), p. 171. McCrea's argument illuminates Elmwood's difficulties in relation to personal notions ofhonour and "demographic crisis." McCrea's focus on patriarchy, however, precludes him from situating Elmwood within the culture ofsensibility and the larger debate about masculinity that I consider. 8 Maria Edgeworth, letter...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,020
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,105

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0200,062
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,012
Communication savante0,0050,007
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetLiterature: history, themes, analysisTravaux en français237 207