MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W205327878 · doi:10.1353/dtc.2011.0017

Fronteras Imaginarias: Theorizing Fronterizidad in the Simulated Illegal Border Crossings of El Alberto, Mexico

2011· article· en· W205327878 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natalie Álvarez

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of dramatic theory and criticism · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLatin American and Latino Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDesert (philosophy)Context (archaeology)SilenceLaughterMoonlightHistorySociologyArtHumanitiesArt historyAestheticsArchaeologyLawLiteraturePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Spring 2011 23 Fronteras Imaginarias: Theorizing Fronterizidad in the Simulated Illegal Border Crossings of El Alberto, Mexico Natalie Alvarez1 “Oye, Gloria, aguantaras hasta California?” (“Hey, Gloria, can you make it to California?”). I was expecting the significance of this tourist’s question to be diffused by nervous laughter, as we crouched, huddled along a dusty path in amongst brush in the dead of night with little moonlight and only our coyote to guide us. The question, instead, was met with awkward silence as we tried to catch our breath. Two hours into this night trek through the desert canyon of El Alberto, Mexico in the heart of the Valle del Mezquital—with our field of vision limited to the person next to us, but imaginatively reaching all the way to the border some seven hundred miles north of the site of this fictional border crossing—the prospect of “making it” “for real” is, in fact, unimaginable. This question, “Can you make it to California?” uttered in the context of this simulated border crossing was an invitation—or perhaps a reminder—for all of us tourists huddled there to immerse ourselves “in the role” of illegal migrant and to try to amplify in our imaginative vistas—by hours, by degrees of hunger, thirst and fatigue, by levels of fear, injury, and threat—this mere fragment of an experience into the kind of journey that it might be, or could be, “for real.” In the time that has passed since this caminata nocturna, or “night walk” as the simulation is called, the question, “Can you make it to California?” remains there in that silence both awkwardly and ominously, a hollow echo of a question undoubtedly uttered in desperation by some of the roughly 600,000 plus migrants who attempt to cross illegally into the United States every year.2 If we think of the border as an interpellating force that hails and constitutes the identities to whom it grants passage or expels, a regulatory force that has come to constitute transnational migrant identities and fronterizas/os in movement across national boundaries, then what constitutive acts take place in a reenactment of this passage? How does a reenacted border crossing lay bare the performative force of the border? Furthermore, in this laying bare what questions does it compel us to ask about the construction of cultural identities made in the image of what Marcial Gonzalez refers to as “the most repressive and racist symbol of demarcation and exclusion produced by capitalism, nationalism, and imperialism—namely, the Natalie Alvarez is an assistant professor at Brock University’s Department of Dramatic Arts, where she teaches in the theatre praxis concentration. She has two edited books (forthcoming) on Latina/oCanadian theatre and performance with Playwrights Canada Press and is currently working on a SSHRC-funded manuscript project titled Enactments of Difference: Simulation and Performance from Military Training to Dark Tourism. 24 Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism border”?3 I’d like to situate the simulated border crossing in El Alberto, Mexico, as a social imaginary and praxis—that is, as a repertory of collective practices and symbolic representations with material impacts on the community—that not only constitute cultural identities but also develop a critical realism seeking to dismantle, paradoxically, the very borders that constitute them.4 The caminata nocturna takes place every Saturday night at the Parque EcoAlberto—an adventure tourism park run by the indigenous community of the Hñahñu in the municipality of Ixmiquilpan, Hidalgo, roughly three hours north of Mexico City. The rugged valley that surrounds the park’s site, thick with cacti and bushes, swamp, and steep, rocky climbs, becomes the obstacle course for a largely improvised game in which some eighty-two members of the Hñahñu community take on a variety of roles in the simulation. These community members play either the coyotes (or polleros), guiding the tourists who have paid roughly twenty US dollars each for this five- to seven-hour journey, or the US border patrol, undermining the performative power of the oppressor in an instance of Boalian Theatre of the Oppressed.5 As these “border patrol officers” chase participants in police cars, they...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,139
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,367

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,329
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of dramatic theory and criticismMême sujetLatin American and Latino StudiesTravaux en français237 207