MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2053622027 · doi:10.1891/1062-8061.22.144

Edward L. Bernays and Nursing’s Code of Ethics: An Unexplored History

2013· article· en· W2053622027 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guy Philbin, David M. Keepnews

Notice bibliographique

RevueNursing History Review · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePublic Relations and Crisis Communication
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEthical codeProfessional conductCode (set theory)Professional associationNursingLawPolitical scienceMedicineComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Code of Ethics occupies a special place in nursing profession. A code of ethical conduct, as Marsha Fowler notes, is of vital importance because it stands as a central and necessary mark of a profession. It functions as a general guide for professions members and as a social contract with public that it serves.1 The Canadian Nurses Association explains that code is a statement of ethical values of nurses and of nurses' commitments to persons with health-care needs and persons receiving care.2 Harold Sox calls codes of ethics the tangible expressions of professionalism and arguably way a profession defines itself to public.3Establishing a code was a priority for American Nurses Associa- tion (ANA) at its founding in 1896.4 Although ANA considered a Proposed Code in 1926 and a Tentative Code in 1940, it was not until 1950 that it ultimately adopted Code for Professional Nurses.5 Three years later, International Council of Nurses adopted its code of ethics (most recently revised in 2012).6 Since that time, numerous national and regional nursing organizations and regulatory bodies have adopted similar codes. We submit that a significant but unexplored factor in ANA's adoption of Code for Professional Nurses in 1950 was role played by Edward L. Bernays, a widely known public relations expert who served as an ANA consultant from August 1947 to April 1949. As part of his efforts to achieve wider recognition for nursing as a profession, he pressed for adoption of a code of ethics from beginning of his brief tenure with ANA until his termination.Edward L. Bernays: U.S. Publicist No. 1Bernays's profound contributions to field of public relations have been well documented by Stuart Ewen and Larry Tye among others.7 put it simply, in words of Ewen, Bernays' career-more than that of any other individual-roughed out what have become strategies and practices of public relations in United States and, increasingly, on a global scale.s Bernays was often called the father of modern public relations9 and U.S. Publicist No. 1, a title attributed to him by Time magazine. Bernays, a nephew of Sigmund Freud, focused his efforts on shaping public opinion in support of his clients. He defined his basic approach as follows: first, intensify favorable attitudes of a public we already have; second, convert a public we do not have to our point of view, and to get them to undertake actions on our behalf; and third, negate or blanket a public against us.10 He called this approach, which was based on propaganda techniques developed during First and Second World Wars, the engineering of consent.11 He prided himself on his ability to manipulate public opinion. His efforts went beyond merely seeking publicity for his clients. I never visited newspapers, he told a reporter in his later years, I circumstances.12He created circumstances for a wide variety of clients, ranging from presidents and entertainers to major corporations and civic organizations. His campaign for American Tobacco Company, which made smoking in public acceptable for women in 1920s, tied smoking to women's social status and independence; it included a march of women holding lit cigarettes, described as Torches of Liberty.13 To promote soap use among schoolchildren (on behalf of his client, Procter and Gamble, who hired him to boost sales of its Ivory Soap brand), he developed a National Soap Sculpture Contest with a noteworthy panel of judges.14 He helped increase flagging sales of hairnets by devising a campaign to link their use to workplace safety.15Bernays worked on behalf of Committee on Cost of Medical Care, a high-profile, foundation-supported initiative whose 1932 report included recommendations to reorganize health care services to make them more widely accessible. These recommendations included encouraging group medical prac- tices and voluntary or tax-supported medical insurance. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,041
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,134

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,025
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,060
Communication savante0,0110,014
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0130,019
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,165
Tête enseignante GPT0,390
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNursing History ReviewMême sujetPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationTravaux en français237 207