MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2054362666 · doi:10.2523/iptc-11657-ms

Reservoir Rock Behavior Pre and Post Pore Collapse during Production

2007· article· en· W2054362666 sur OpenAlexaff
Hadi Belhaj, Alireza Nouri

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCompactionPermeability (electromagnetism)PorosityBreakageGeotechnical engineeringGeologyPore water pressureEffective stressCementGrain sizeMaterials scienceComposite materialChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract It is very common that effective stresses increase as reservoir fluids being produced from both shallow and deep reservoirs. It may seem reasonable to assume that permeability and porosity decrease as pore pressure declines, since effective volumetrical stresses become intensified during reservoir depletion. However, laboratory results show that this is not always the case. A series of very delicate experimental procedures was conducted to reveal some of the most interesting phenomena in pore collapse and their impact on permeability. Sandstone samples were tested using a triaxial set-up. Experimental results show that porosity is certainly decreases as a result of the compaction process, which allows the breakage of grain-to-grain cement bonds. Grain particles will become more compacted as both lateral and axial effective stresses increase. On the other hand, permeability shows no definite trend. In weak reservoir formation, pore collapse does not occur suddenly. Rather, rocks gradually compact as grain-to-grain cement bonds break down. It was found that permeability indeed changes as effective stresses increase. Nevertheless, the pathway to permeability was found to be much more complex than previously stipulated. It was discovered that enhancement or damage to permeability is not a function of pore collapse alone. Other factors, such as stress path, initial porosity, particle size, and particle shape and distribution play a major role in determining the type of permeability alteration and the severity of this change. Introduction As reservoir production continues during pressure depletion process, effective stresses within the reservoir increase. It may seem reasonable to assume that the effect of stresses on porosity and permeability of the reservoir is more severe when porosity and permeability are high, although some experimental studies like Hubbert and Willis1, Voight2, and Rosepiler3 showed this effect is still significant even at low porosity and permeability. It is also understood that stress paths have a large influence on horizontal and vertical permeability and also on porosity. The elastic uniaxial strain model is mostly used in reservoir engineering to describe production-induced changes in horizontal stress due to pore pressure decline (pressure depletion). It predicts the total horizontal stress by using overburden stress, reservoir pressure decrease, and material mechanical parameters. The principal assumption in this model is that there is no lateral deformation (zero horizontal strain condition) during the depletion process. For a sandstone rock, Ruistuen et al.4 showed that the ratio of change in minimum effective horizontal stress to the change in effective vertical stress in a reservoir depletion process was 0.53. This effective stress relationship was believed to be the same for production-induced or geologically-induced changes in pore pressure, i.e. before reservoir disturbed by production. Schutjens et al.5 concluded that in an elastic domain of deformations, permeability reduction is predominantly controlled by mean effective stress increase and not by stress path. Depletion of the reservoir may contribute to the failure of the formation in two ways. Pore collapse is one of the mechanisms which in fact is a volumetric failure. This mechanism is mainly activated where lateral displacement is either zero or small. In this case, shear failure cannot take place and the only mechanism for material disaggregation would be pore collapse through volumetric failure. For this mechanism to be activated, material must have a high porosity and low strength. If the stress path meets the cap, i.e. volumetric failure surface, volumetric failure takes place. Another failure mechanism induced by depletion is shear. As the reservoir pressure depletes, effective stresses increase. The increase of effective stresses around the wellbore deforms perforation cavities and shears them. Depletion induces shear stress increment, which adds to the shear stress induced by pressure drawdown. As depletion increases, shear failure develops, which, in the worst condition, fails it.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,427
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,666

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceMême sujetHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisTravaux en français237 207