MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2054457244 · doi:10.1353/sew.2014.0074

Revaluation a Salute to Robertson Davies

2014· article· en· W2054457244 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
George Core

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œSewanee review · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShort Stories in Global Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTrilogyCornishGreatnessGeniusPoetryLiteratureArt historyMiscellanyTheme (computing)ArtHistoryPerformance artClassics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Revaluation a Salute to Robertson Davies George Core Robertson Davies , The Cornish Trilogy. Penguin Books , 1992 . $30 pb. The author may be a genius without illusion, like Shakespeare, or a world-saver, like Tolstoy, or a philosopher and ironist, like Thomas Mann, or an agonist, like Dostoevsky, or an illuminator of [End Page 519] dark corners, like Dickens, but he tells us what he sees the way he sees it; in the infinite variety of things told, or wisdom distilled in poetry, an astonishingly small number of essential truths emerge. —Robertson Davies, “A Try for Greatness” Robertson Davies is described by Penguin Books in these words: he “had three successive careers: first as an actor with the Old Vic Company in England; then as a publisher of the Peterborough, Ontario, Examiner; and later as a university professor and first Master of Massey College at the University of Toronto, from which he retired in 1981. He wrote more than thirty books, including several volumes of plays, as well as collections of essays, speeches, and belles lettres, and eleven novels. It was as a novelist that he gained lasting renown, for his Deptford Trilogy . . . , for the Salterton Trilogy . . . , and for the Cornish Trilogy.” He was, as the Washington Post wrote at the time of his death, “the most distinguished and original writer of his generation.” I would bet he is the best Canadian writer in the nation’s history. He is the only major novelist in English to have written three trilogies. Ford Madox Ford wrote two, as did Joyce Cary and Olivia Manning. Davies’s novels include two more well-regarded books, and, to repeat, he wrote over thirty books. When he died, he was writing his memoirs. In all, the trilogies run to about 3,000 pages. I am choosing the last to focus on because it strikes me as the most ambitious, finished, engaging, and successful—a masterpiece of fictive art. After its publication in 1988, Robertson Davies should have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. Over the past two to three decades no one to my knowledge exceeds him, and his only strong rival is Patrick White. Davies was an immensely learned man who put his learning to good use in his fiction without being dogmatic or didactic. He typically creates many characters, flat and round (especially round); he uses complicated and lengthy narrative sequences—plots and subplots—that parallel and reinforce one another. The Cornish Trilogy (The Rebel Angels, What’s Bred in the Bone, and The Lyre of Orpheus) is superficially an account of the life of Francis Cornish and his sprawling family connection, which runs from his monstrous older brother (who dies as a child) to his wealthy and generous grandfather, his parents, and his wretched wife, who is a sexually promiscuous thief and immoralist. He leaves the family money for a foundation, one of whose members, Simon Darcourt, is writing Cornish’s biography, who has been an artist, an art restorer, and an agent for the British secret service. Among other things Davies was a mystery writer who was not only fascinated by painting, drama, magic, and religion, but many other subjects, [End Page 520] especially music. His knowledge of religion ran from Protestantism (especially Methodism and Anglicanism) to Catholicism and Gnosticism—all shades of mythology and magic (black and white). The mysteries that generate the action of the Cornish Trilogy include these questions: Who was the Alchemical Artist who painted a great allegorical picture in the sixteenth-century style of the Old Masters? Who murdered one of the board members in the Cornish Trust? If and how did the wretched and wicked John Parablane kill himself and for what reason? What happened to Parablane’s endless unreadable novel? Did he sire the illegitimate son who is eager to recover the manuscript? How did the wife of Arthur Cornish (who is sterile) become impregnated? And so on . . . . This wife, Maria Magdalena Theotoky, is a Gypsy, as are her parents; and her mother has a leading role in the action. Maria is loved profoundly by virtually all the leading male characters. The Gypsy background provides Davies with the opportunity to elaborate on various Gypsy...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,119

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,039
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,012
Communication savante0,0160,009
Science ouverte0,0040,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0160,023
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0360,024

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œSewanee reviewMême sujetShort Stories in Global LiteratureTravaux en français237 207