Persistent Coma in Strongyloides Hyperinfection Syndrome Associated With Persistently Increased Ivermectin Levels
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor—We share an interesting clinical case that impacts on the treatment of Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome. A 64-year-old man was admitted to our intensive care unit for postoperative care after aortic valve replacement. His previous medical history was relevant for giant cell arteritis for which he was using prednisone. Three days postoperatively, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure developed. Sputum was collected, and high numbers of mobile Strongyloides stercoralis larvae were observed and a diagnosis of S. stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome with dissemination was made. Ivermectin therapy, first orally and later subcutaneously, was initiated. Although numbers of live Strongyloides decreased rapidly and his clinical condition improved, he remained in a persistent vegetative state and the patient died. Given the fact that other causes for a persistent coma were excluded, we suspected that neurotoxicity of ivermectin might have been responsible for the persistent coma. Ivermectin is generally a safe drug that does not accumulate even in high dosages when given to healthy volunteers [1]. However, cases of encephalopathy have been reported [1, 2], which is associated with coma in animals [3, 4]. To analyze whether drug accumulation was present in our patient, we measured ivermectin levels in serum during and after treatment as well as in autopsy-derived brain tissue (Figure 1). A steady state of serum levels was reached after 5 days, but hereafter no diminishment of serum ivermectin levels was observed even after ivermectin treatment had been discontinued for 11 days. In line with this, the ivermectin level in brain tissue was still markedly elevated (30 ng/g brain tissue) at the time of death, 14 days after the last ivermectin treatment. Such a markedly elevated concentration may have been attributed to severe neurotoxicity. This high concentration of ivermectin in brain long after ivermectin treatment was discontinued might be related to loss- of-function mutations in the multidrug-resistant mdr1/abcb1 gene encoding for P-glycoprotein, which excretes ivermectin out of the systemic compartment as well as the central nervous system. We investigated the most common single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with decreased abcb1 expression and found that none were present in our patient. Secondly, after careful review of all comedications used during treatment, no probable relation between these and decreased ivermectin elimination was observed. This report illustrates that ivermectin treatment may lead to persistently elevated levels of ivermectin in serum and abnormal drug brain level during treatment of S. stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome, potentially leading to severe neurotoxicity even in the absence of genetic or iatrogenic factors known to decrease ivermectin elimination. Our report is of significance as it shows that generally reported treatment schemes, which advocate daily treatment with ivermectin for extended periods during hyperinfection syndrome, may do harm. Treatment should be closely guided by serum levels, and once appropriately effective serum levels are obtained, no further dosages of ivermectin should be given unless the infection is still uncontrolled and serum levels are decreasing significantly. Time curve of ivermectin levels in serum. Ivermectin serum levels are shown. Day 1 indicates first day of ivermectin treatment. Patient was treated from days 1–8 with ivermectin. Days of ivermectin administration, per oral (po) or subcutaneous (sc), are shown above the arrows. Curve indicates corresponding ivermectin serum levels. Last ivermectin level was measured 11 days after the last administration. From day 10 onward, no live larvae were observed in sputum. Patient died at day 25. Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».