MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2055262849 · doi:10.1353/vpr.0.0016

Today and Tomorrow: Meeting the Digital Challenge

2008· article· en· W2055262849 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Kathryn Ledbetter

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueLibrary Collection Development and Digital Resources
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryArt historyStyle (visual arts)Visual artsMedia studiesArtSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Today and TomorrowMeeting the Digital Challenge Kathryn Ledbetter (bio) I was finishing up on the last day of a VISAWUS conference I organized in Austin in 2003 when Bill Scheuerle and Richard Fulton encouraged me to apply for the editorship at VPR. I was then co-editing a slick biannual titled The Journal of Texas Music History at Texas State University. I knew how much work went into producing that publication. I thought a quarterly would be twice the work but twice the fun because I could keep up on the latest research in my field of Victorian periodicals. Eventually I received a very supportive acceptance letter from Laurel Brake, and I used my frequent flyer miles to meet with Bill in Florida so I could make a smooth transition. He supplied me with about two years of essays, a timely publication schedule with the University of Toronto Press, and an efficient editing system kept in tune by his assistant, Robin Rogers. My first visible presence as editor was evident in 38:1 (Spring 2005) with a change to vanilla parchment paper stock and matching page color. In my editor's comments I explained: "Parchment reminds me of the elegant look displayed in early Victorian literary annuals, and our trademark framing design replicates decorative features often found in periodicals of a later artistic period." I suggested this stylistic union as a reminder of our mission to "better understand the fascinating diversity of Victorian periodicals." I also began to feature the Table of Contents on the back cover, as suggested by Laurel Brake (fig. 1). I revised my Editorial Board, vowing to make full use of this group, and I am grateful for their hard work and energetic support. Book Review Editor Shirley Sackman soon retired from Clark College and from her position with VPR. After a brief search, we chose Solveig Robinson to replace Shirley, and Solveig has efficiently and professionally provided a steady supply of excellent reviews since 38:2 (Summer 2005). Alexis Easley then took Solveig's place as Bibliographer. [End Page 55] Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 1. Back cover of VPR 38:1 (Spring 2005) [End Page 56] My biggest, most embarrassing mistake as the new editor was a misidentification in the biographies section of longtime RSVP member Joel Wiener as Rice University historian Martin Joel Wiener. I had recently met the latter at the VISAWUS conference I organized in Austin, and his name would not budge from my memory until dislodged by Patrick Leary who politely corrected me. I could whine about not having an assistant and being too busy and easily neglectful of such details, but reading over the accounts from my predecessors in this issue I am shamed by any attempts at lame excuses. At least I have E-mail and a fast computer. Previous editors remind me what it was like without these electronic tools. (During my undergraduate days in the 1970s an English professor suggested that if I really wanted to be prepared for the future I would learn how to use a computer. I thought he was crazy. I was an English major. Why would I need a computer? They were for math majors, and I couldn't imagine what anyone could do on a computer except balance a checkbook. Things change.) Like Walter Houghton, I am no Luddite, but I do still prefer to receive hard copies by post, and I still prefer writing letters of acceptance or refusal on letterhead most of the time. During my tenure as editor, I inherited from Bill one special issue guest edited by Andrea Broomfield in honor of Sally Mitchell, published in 38:2 (Summer 2005). Another special issue edited by Teresa Mangum on "Periodical Pedagogy" was very popular and also expensive because it exceeded our usual page limit by 50 pages. I did not anticipate the space that would be taken by variations in format within sample syllabi provided by individual authors. However, I thought it was an excellent issue and well worth the expenditure. One of the most important events during these few years has been new opportunities provided by financial gifts to our organization. RSVP...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,080
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,266

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0210,003
Communication savante0,0210,017
Science ouverte0,0020,013
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0800,022

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetLibrary Collection Development and Digital ResourcesTravaux en français237 207