Heavy Oil Viscosity Prediction Using Surface Response Methodology
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Modern petroleum engineering practices require accurate reservoir phase behavior properties to simulate and optimize various production and processing operations. Among these reservoir fluid properties, viscosity is an important property during the design of pipelines, production and processing equipment, well testing, and reservoir simulation. Direct viscosity measurement of the reservoir fluid requires representative reservoir fluid sampling that is expensive and often unavailable. Therefore, common procedure in industry is using developed correlations to predict the viscosity of the crudes. However, the major shortcomings of these correlations lie in their extremely simplistic or complex nature that reduces their applicability. In addition, commonly used correlations in industry were developed on the basis of data from special regions of the world that limit their applications as a universal approach for viscosity estimation. In this study, the main objective is developing a simple and efficient approach for prediction of medium to heavy oil viscosity by using Response Surface Methodology technique. For this purpose two datasets, 45 phase behavior data of medium to heavy crudes (12-25 °API) from Alberta and Saskatchewan and 110 data points from literature(6-22 °API), have been used during training, testing, and validation processes. The obtained results in this study indicate that the response surface methodology approach is successful in prediction of dead, live, and under-saturated crude viscosities over the range of data used for training process. In other words it can be safely concluded that response surface methodology can be used as an efficient tool for prediction of viscosity in the medium to heavy range of western Canadian crudes. Introduction Simulation and optimization of crude oil production and processing require proper understanding of reservoir fluid phase behavior. Among these properties crude oil viscosity is considered as one of the most important characteristics of reservoir fluid that controls fluid flow in porous media and influences the design of downhole and surface facilities and transportation systems. The routine practice in industry is fluid sampling from the reservoir and using laboratory measured viscosity values for various design purposes. However, there are cases where such direct measurements are not available. Therefore, as a common approach the PVT correlations are applied to predict the crude oil properties. Fundamentally, there are two approaches for crude oil viscosity predictions. The first approach uses oilfield data, such as reservoir temperature, produced oil API gravity, solution gas-oil ratio, to predict the oil viscosity (Beal [1], Glaso [2], and Kartoatmodjo and Schmidt [3]). The second approach is empirical and/or semi-empirical correlations that are using other data for prediction of crude oil viscosity, such as reservoir fluid composition, pour point temperature, normal boiling point, critical temperature, and acentric factor of components (Lorenz et al. [4] Little and Kennedy [5], and Pederson et al. [6]). These correlations are either generated by using random data sets or phase behavior data from specific geographical areas or specific class/type of oils. The major shortcomings of these correlations lie in their extremely simplistic or complex nature that reduces their applicability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».