MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2056190220 · doi:10.1177/1941738109332024

Let’s Play Ball

2009· article· en· W2056190220 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLeagueNewspaperYardSuperstarHistoryArt historyMedia studiesSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It’s that time of year—frozen northern fields begin to show a little green as predictions of the upcoming season abound from spring training in the south. As spring leaps forth from the doldrums of winter, America’s pastime consumes more of the newspaper sports section. Having grown up in an era when kids spent the most of their summer vacation around baseball diamonds, I watch with interest as the NFL, NBA, and NHL vie for the sports fan’s attention. To those who say baseball is no longer the energizer of America’s spirit, I would suggest a warm summer evening at Camden Yards, Comerica Park, or one of the like to gauge the interest of Americans. A review of Major League Baseball rosters or ESPN’s coverage of the Little League World Series demonstrates the global attraction of the sport. Although never popular in Europe or Russia, Canada, Central and South America, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Japan have all adopted the game. Flush with folklore from the likes of Cobb, Ruth, and Williams, baseball’s past is rich as it continues to churn out heartwarming stories such as that of Josh Hamilton of the Texas Rangers. In the words of current Texas Ranger President, Nolan Ryan, “Josh is one of the most talented baseball players I’ve ever seen.”1 Josh was the first player chosen in the 1999 baseball draft; he was an amazing combination of speed and power, destined to become a superstar. By 2002, he had fallen to the depths of society, ravaged by drug addiction and despair. His struggle to overcome these evil spirits and his phenomenal return to professional baseball was highlighted by his All-Star debut in 2008. Through his record-breaking performance at Yankee Stadium at the 2008 All-Star Home Run Derby, Josh sent a clear message of hope to all whose lives had been destroyed by the evils of drug addiction. How did this happen? Was Josh’s fall a rare occurrence? I think it’s quite commonplace nowadays. Society gives young superstars every opportunity to go bad by placing them on a pedestal, not holding them to an appropriate standard of behavior, and making excuses for boorish behavior on and off the field. Many times the early warning signs are there but ignored by family, friends, teammates, coaches, and clinicians. It doesn’t usually start at the professional level; frequently, different rules apply for high school and college stars to unfairly protect them in order that they may continue entertaining us. Many athletes throw away their unbelievable career opportunities—and sometimes their lives—because of their inability to become responsible citizens. How sad it is to witness the star athlete who had the world by the tail but ends up with nothing but regrets, banishment, and/or jail time. As sports medicine professionals, we can become part of the system that fails these athletes if we don’t pay attention to more than pitch counts, sore arms, and swollen knees, missing the danger signs of everything from alcohol abuse to steroid rage. Yes, we know the signs and symptoms of many of the problems that teenagers and young adults face. As clinicians we should be aware of the pitfalls of these lurid life styles. We can play a key role in the lives of many athletes, as they often trust us and may be willing to listen if we are willing to speak up. Those who have witnessed these tragedies know how devastating they can be to the athlete, their family, and the community. It’s better to speak up when the danger signs are there than to suddenly find that it’s too late to say anything at all.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,828
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle