MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2056434097 · doi:10.1136/bmj.a239

Sexuality and older people

2008· letter· en· W2056434097 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueBMJ · 2008
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSexual function and dysfunction studies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHuman sexualityPsychologySexual intercourseInterviewClinical psychologySexual desireMedicineGerontologyPopulationGender studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Much of the literature on sexuality in elderly people focuses on sexual problems, leaving clinicians with the impression that older adults have either dismal or non-existent sex lives. Few data are available on “normal” sexuality in elderly people, let alone the entire spectrum of sexual expression including optimal sexuality.1 Beckman and colleagues’ linked study makes a welcome contribution to the limited literature on sexuality in older people.2 A major contribution of Beckman and colleagues’ study is that it focuses on sexual attitudes and behaviour in a sample of people—not patients—who are not seeking treatment for sexual dysfunction or attending a general medical clinic. The methodology is strong, using consistent interviewing techniques over a 30 year period to produce four comparable sets of cross sectional data from 1971 to 2001. Current knowledge suggests that sexual functioning and frequency decline with age and that sex decreases in importance over time.3 The existing literature emphasises the widespread prevalence of sexual difficulties in men and women.4 5 In contrast, Beckman and colleagues provide good news—sex is an important and positive part of the lives of their 70 year old participants, and more so for the current cohort of men and women than for their predecessors in 1971. Although these data are invaluable, the study does have limitations. Sexual activity was defined as sexual intercourse, and the researchers’ questions about same sex activities and self stimulation were discontinued after 1971 for fear of offending participants. The study reports that subjective sexual satisfaction is increasing, especially in women, even if sexual dysfunctions are present. Some dysfunctions such as female anorgasmia and erectile dysfunction are decreasing, whereas others such as ejaculatory dysfunction in men have increased over the past 30 years. The authors speculate that the decrease in erectile dysfunction in 70 year old men may result from the availability of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Male sexual dissatisfaction and ejaculatory dysfunction increased in the latest cohort. One interpretation is that older men are “performing” better sexually thanks to erectogenic drugs, but enjoying themselves less, thus the difficulty in male orgasm. The meaning of these findings is worthy of further investigation. Attitudes to sexuality seem to be converging in men and women even though some behaviours remain strikingly constant. Beckman and colleagues seemingly link the increasingly early sexual debut seen over the past 30 years with increasingly positive attitudes to sexuality over time. The implication is that a generation’s sexual change—perhaps linked to the sexual revolution of 1965-75—is evident in this latest cohort of 70 year olds in 2001. Yet, interestingly, both men and women continue to blame men when sexual intercourse ceases between them. This finding has been consistent for 40 years.6 7 Perhaps some aspects of heterosexual relationships are so deeply ingrained that they are more resistant to change. Even if women seem to be coming into their own sexually—and more satisfied than ever in the latest cohort—years of men being in charge of “making the first move” in adolescent sexual encounters in the 1940s and during marriage in early adulthood in the 1950s and 1960s has led to the expectation that men remain responsible for making sex happen. Thus, attributing the responsibility for the frequency or lack of sex to men continues. Perhaps the findings are a manifestation of the time lag between a change in attitude and the ultimate shift in sexual behaviour patterns in heterosexual couples. Clinicians should be sensitive to this mindset when probing into patients’ concerns over sexual frequency, desire, initiation, satisfaction, and their meanings to all parties. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice? Doctors in general are known to be uncomfortable about asking patients questions about their sex lives. This is particularly so when the patients’ personal characteristics differ from their own (for example, their sex, age, sexual orientation).8 9 This may be especially disadvantageous when dealing with elderly patients who are already assumed to be invisible and post-sexual by society. Such people may be even less likely than most to approach their doctors with sexual problems and concerns, although research shows that most people hope that their doctors will approach them.10 Given that sex plays an increasingly valuable role in the lives of older men and women, Beckman and colleagues’ study reinforces the dictum that doctors should ask—and be trained to ask—every patient, regardless of age, “Any sexual concerns?”9 Doctors are well placed to normalise and affirm the value of fulfilling sexual relations for the wellbeing of older patients.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,156
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,798

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,053
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,277 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle