War on the Home Front: The Farm Diaries of Daniel MacMillan, 1914–1927 (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: War on the Home Front: The Farm Diaries of Daniel MacMillan, 1914–1927 Deborah Stiles War on the Home Front: The Farm Diaries of Daniel MacMillan, 1914–1927. Edited by Bill Parenteau and Stephen Dutcher. Vol. 7, The New Brunswick Military Heritage Series. Fredericton: Goose Lane Editions/New Brunswick Military Heritage Project, 2006. Pp. 109, illus., b&w, $16.95 March 3, 1916 – I had a recruiting officer call on me today . . . wanting to know if I had any notion of going and having a crack at the Germans. I am considerably over age – fifty-three the twenty-second of this month. He thought if I proved otherwise fit I could perhaps pass for some years younger. However, I feel my age in some respects . . . and I really think I can do my bit better here on the farm than any other place. – Daniel MacMillan, War on the Home Front In North America these days, historians are more likely to be protesting or writing about war than directly experiencing it. Sans this context, a book with the title War on the Home Front might refer to that old joke of gendered, domestic battle lines. But as more and more of the domestic costs of war are felt by Iraqi, Afghani, Canadian, and American families, it's obvious there's nothing at all funny about war. Similarly, as New Brunswicker Daniel MacMillan struggled to work his family's farm during and after the First World War, the diary he kept, now available to the broader public in War on the Home Front, makes apparent the tightly woven and gendered fabric of war and civilian life. Williamsburg, near Stanley, above Fredericton, is the farm and woods-working country Daniel MacMillan wrote from. The book's introduction, written by Acadiensis editors Bill Parenteau and Stephen Dutcher, aids the diaries in revealing both war and postwar periods. Much as the novels Trente arpents and Grain have done for fiction readers for years, MacMillan's diaries illuminate the early twentieth-century rural past. Consider, for example, these excerpts from 28 May, and 12 and 14 November 1922: Donald Hossack [returned soldier], who has been giving less or more trouble at the upper end of the settlement for the past year or more, finished up . . . by setting fire to William T. Craig's buildings [sawmill] . . . a number of men gathered and kept him there until the officers of the law arrived and took charge of him. Scott McNeil of Maple Grove and Schell Humble took him to the hospital in Saint John . . . This is really a case which should have been attended to before this, as Donald gave sufficient evidence that something was wrong with his mind on several occasions . . . Today Schell Humble and I weighed twenty ewes which I have decided to let go . . . I have kept fourteen of the youngest, bred from the run [perhaps run should be ram?] I bought from the government in the fall of 1918. Charlie [MacMillan's brother] intended to sell the whole flock, but it is likely I will stay here this winter. I thought I would try and take a few over the winter. It seems too bad that such conditions were brought [End Page 528] about as to compel the giving away of these ewes, as that is about all it amounts to, 2 ½ cts. per lb. live weight . . . I helped drive away twenty head of sheep this morning. Poor things, some of them I have taken care of for seven and eight years. Sheep is a line of stock that I always liked. There is not the work attached to taking care of them that there is to cows . . . Then the poor things are so lovable, so shy, so trusting. (94–5) In their introduction – in a turn of phrase echoing Danny Samson's groundbreaking 'History looks different from the countryside' assertion, made in Contested Countryside – Dutcher and Parenteau state, 'The Great War looked different from the countryside' (10). Indeed. When observed and analyzed from a rural perspective, the First World War, that early twentieth-century imperialistic adventure – the one we tell our students made Canada a country – really is a whole other...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».