MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2057158648 · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-132-3-200002010-00012

Helical Computed Tomography and the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

2000· letter· en· W2057158648 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Shannon M. Bates, Jeffrey S. Ginsberg

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of Internal Medicine · 2000
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePulmonary embolismPulmonary angiographyCardiologyInternal medicineRadiologyNuclear medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editorials1 February 2000Helical Computed Tomography and the Diagnosis of Pulmonary EmbolismShannon M. Bates, MD, FRCP(C) and Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, MD, FRCP(C)Shannon M. Bates, MD, FRCP(C)From McMaster University and Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre; Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author and Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, MD, FRCP(C)From McMaster University and Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre; Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-3-200002010-00012 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Acute pulmonary embolism is a common and potentially life-threatening disorder (1). Treatment is highly effective (2) but not without complications, and the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism therefore requires a high degree of certainty. Conversely, if untreated, pulmonary embolism can be fatal.The clinical diagnosis alone is inaccurate for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary angiography remains the diagnostic reference standard, but it is invasive and expensive, is not universally available, and is associated with morbidity (in 2% to 5% of patients) and death (in <1% of patients) (3). Ventilation-perfusion scanning, the most commonly used screening technique, provides a probability estimate for ...References1. Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A, Weg JG, Fulkerson WJ, Palevsky HI, et al . The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1240-5. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Alpert JS, Smith R, Carlson J, Ockene IS, Dexter L, Dalen JE. Mortality in patients treated for pulmonary embolism. JAMA. 1976;236:1477-80. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Cheely R, McCartney WH, Perry JR, Delany DJ, Bustad L, Wynia VH, et al . The role of noninvasive tests versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 1981;70:17-22. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990;263:2753-9. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, et al . Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:997-1005. LinkGoogle Scholar6. Gerard SK, Hsu TC. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT versus ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy [Letter]. Radiology. 1999;210:576-7. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Rathbun SW, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL. Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:227-32. LinkGoogle Scholar8. Crawford CR, King KF. Computed tomography scanning with simultaneous patient translation. Med Phys. 1990;17:967-82. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Kauczor HU, Heussel CP, Thelen M. Update on diagnostic strategies of pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:262-75. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Dixon AK, Dendy P. Spiral CT: how much does radiation dose matter? Lancet. 1998;352:1082-3. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F. Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique—comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 1992;185:381-7. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Kim KI, Muller NL, Mayo JR. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. Radiology. 1999;210:693-7. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Greaves SM, Hart EM, Brown K, Young DA, Batra P, Aberle DR. Pulmonary thromboembolism: spectrum of findings on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1359-63. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. Christiansen F. Diagnostic imaging of acute pulmonary embolism. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1997;410:1-33. MedlineGoogle Scholar15. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL, Remy J, Worsley DF, Hossein-Foucher C, et al . Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1997;205:447-52. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, Foley WD, Lipchik RJ, et al . Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1369-74. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17. Blum AG, Delfau F, Grignon B, Beurrier D, Chabot F, Claudon M, et al . Spiral-computed tomography versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of acute massive pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:96-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18. van Rossum AB, Treurniet FE, Kieft GJ, Smith SJ, Schepers-Bok R. Role of spiral volumetric computed tomographic scanning in the assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism and an abnormal ventilation/perfusion lung scan. Thorax. 1996;51:23-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19. Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR, Brink JA. Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross-sectional imaging. Radiology. 1996;199:31-5. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20. Stein PD, Henry JW. Prevalence of acute pulmonary embolism in central and subsegmental pulmonary arteries and relation to probability interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scans. Chest. 1997;111:1246-8. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Shannon M. Bates, MD, FRCP(C); Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, MD, FRCP(C)Affiliations: From McMaster University and Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre; Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, CanadaGrant Support: Dr. Bates is a recipient of a Research Fellowship from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. Dr. Ginsberg is a Career Investigator of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.Corresponding Author: Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, MD, FRCP(C), Thromboembolism Unit, HHSC 3X28 McMaster University Medical Centre, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada; e-mail, [email protected]csu.mcmaster.ca.Current Author Addresses: Dr. Bates: Thromboembolism Unit, HHSC Room, 3W15, McMaster University Medical Center, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada.Dr. Ginsberg: Thromboembolism Unit, HHSC Room 3X28, McMaster University Medical Centre, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoSensitivity and Specificity of Helical Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism Suman W. Rathbun , Gary E. Raskob , and Thomas L. Whitsett Metrics Cited byDiagnosis and Management for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolismMeta-Analysis: Outcomes in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Managed with Computed Tomographic Pulmonary AngiographyLisa K. Moores, MD, William L. Jackson Jr., MD, Andrew F. Shorr, MD, MPH, and Jeffrey L. Jackson, MD, MPHThe Added Value of Spiral Computed Tomographic Angiography After Lung Scintigraphy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary EmbolismFuture generation CT imagingInfectious mononucleosis complicated by mediastinal lymphadenopathy causing transient pulmonary artery stenosisManagement of venous thromboembolism during pregnancyDiagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancyAnticoagulation patterns and clinical decision-making following an intermediate ventilation-perfusion scan in pulmonary thromboembolismPulmonary Embolism: What have We Learned Since Virchow?Comparison of lung scintigraphy and CT angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolismComputed tomography scan versus ventilation-perfusion lung scan in the detection of pulmonary embolismDefining the role of helical computerised tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) 1 February 2000Volume 132, Issue 3Page: 240-242KeywordsAngiographyComputed axial tomographyLungsProspective studiesPulmonary arteriesPulmonary embolismSafety studiesSpecificityThromboembolismVentilation perfusion ePublished: 15 August 2000 Issue Published: 1 February 2000 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2000 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,022
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations21
Publié2000
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of Internal MedicineMême sujetVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementTravaux en français237 207