MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2057484836 · doi:10.1891/1062-8061.21.89

“Such a Many-Purpose Job”: Nursing, Identity, and Place with the Grenfell Mission, 1939–1960

2012· article· en· W2057484836 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Heidi Coombs-Thorne

Notice bibliographique

RevueNursing History Review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensMemorial University of Newfoundland
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth careNursingPolitical scienceGeographyManagementMedicineLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In July 1947, Nurse Jean Smith wrote in Grenfell Mission's quarterly magazine, Among Deep Sea Fishers:When I leftEngland two years ago I little expected to have such a many-purpose job. The trained staffof one has a variety of duties to perform, among which are those of housekeeper, cook, farmer, butcher, gardener, painter, carpenter, general overseer and handyman, clothing-store-keeper, accountant, nursing and dentistry besides.1For nurses posted to nursing stations of Grenfell Mission in Newfoundland and Labrador, Smith's statement was not an exaggeration. Because of demands of nursing on isolated stations, nurses became adept at changing hats and assuming whatever role was necessary for provision of health care and smooth running of station. Their formal hospital-based training only went so far in preparing them for range of duties they would perform, duties that were required out of necessity because of physical geography and sparse settlement pattern of region and decentralized structure of mission.The Grenfell Mission was established in 1893 by British physician Wilfred Thomason Grenfell in response to lack of basic health care he witnessed in Labrador during his 1892 visit. Under Grenfell's direction, mission became an enduring health care organization designed to reach people living in isolated coastal communities in northern Newfoundland and Labrador. For almost 90 years, it operated an extensive health care system along hundreds of miles of rugged and thinly populated coastline. During time of this article (1939-1960), this system included one large hospital at St. Anthony; two small hospitals with resident physicians at Harrington Harbour and North West River; and between 6 and 13 nursing stations staffed by one or two nurses who were often trained midwives from Britain. The mission founders had considered it impossible and impractical to have trained surgeons available on [the] coast2 for two main reasons: small communities of northern Newfoundland and Labrador were not attractive destinations for many physicians who preferred to practice in larger centers for personal and professional reasons, and mission could not justify expense of hiring physicians for small isolated settlements. As a result of this decentralized structure and lack of physicians outside few hospitals, nurses on stations enjoyed a degree of professional responsibility that was unusual in larger, more conventional medical institutions. And mission came to rely heavily on services of these nurses. As a medical superintendent, Charles Curtis pointed out in 1946: the main care and diagnosis of serious illness [depended] . . . on nurse in outlying district in a small nursing station who [was] intimately connected with people and [saw] a case early.3But what did it mean to be a nurse in Western society during 1940s and 1950s? What was required of a nurse with Grenfell Mission, and how did that differ from image of a nurse according to training programs and conventional hospital standards? Did job requirements of mission challenge nurses' notions of professional identity? This article addresses these questions by examining work experience and personal recollections of nurses with Grenfell Mission in northern Newfoundland and Labrador between 1939 and 1960. Grenfell nurses performed various non-nursing and even nonhealth- related duties that were not typical nursing responsibilities according to educational and professional standards of 1940s and 1950s, including diagnosing and treating outpatients, dentistry, administration, agriculture, and station or hospital housekeeping. By exploring nurses' own writings during time they nursed in these unique circumstances, I argue that nursing with Grenfell Mission, because of physical geography and decentralized structure of mission, did, indeed, challenge nurses' professional identities and their understandings of what it meant to be a nurse. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,550
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,894

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,015
Communication savante0,0040,005
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNursing History ReviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207