IS CHILDREN’S FASTER RECOVERY FROM EXERCISE DUE TO A HIGHER METABOLITE CLEARANCE RATE?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Editor-in-Chief: We are writing regarding a recent article by Zafeiridis et al. (5), comparing recovery from high-intensity exercise in boys, adolescents, and adults. A faster recovery of performance capacity (knee flexion/extension) was demonstrated in children and adolescents compared with adults. It was concluded that recovery rate was maturity dependent. While the study and its results are well presented, we believe there is a significant discussion oversight regarding the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. The authors speculate that a possible explanation may be a higher metabolite (lactate, H+) clearance rate in children: “Based on these facts, the possibility that the boys and teens in the current study had faster removal of lactate that facilitated the recovery process should not be excluded” (p. 511). The authors failed to consider the experimental evidence that contradicts their explanation. We addressed this very issue in a paper by Dotan et al. (1), which demonstrated, that blood lactate (La) disappearance rate following high-intensity exercise, is strikingly similar in children and adults, despite markedly different peak values ([La]peak). It was shown that not only was children’s La-disappearance half-time similar to that of adults, but that there was no difference between their La-recovery curves following similar [La]peak values. The only consistent difference being children’s shorter lag time to [La]peak. Therefore, it was argued that faster recovery in children is not due to a more efficient metabolite clearance rate, but rather to the fact that they have less to recover from (lower power output and La production) and that their [La]peak is reached sooner. The evidence of children’s lower sympathetic activation (3) that Zafeiridis et al. (5) cite in support of their view only supports our notion that children are anaerobically inferior, precisely because they are unable to fully mobilize their sympathetic system and recruit higher hierarchy motor units. This would explain their lower La production but not a faster La clearance. This is not to exclude other factors that separate boys from men (e.g., faster phosphocreatine resynthesis (2,4)). However, future research may well demonstrate that many or all of these differences stem from the alleged maturation-related difference in recruitment potential. Bareket Falk Raffy Dotan Brock University, Department of Physical Education and Kinesiology, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,031 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».