MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2058097412 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2003.0040

Mansfield Park , and: Pride and Prejudice (review)

2003· article· en· W2058097412 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Barbara K. Seeber

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPridePrejudice (legal term)CriticismSociologyPsychoanalysisPsychologyArtPhilosophyTheologyLiteratureSocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

324 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION15:2 Jane Austen. Mansfield Park. Ed.June Sturrock. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2001. 521pp. $11.95; US$8.95; £4.95. ISBN 1-55111098 -9. Jane Austen. Pride and Prejudice. Ed. Robert P. Irvine. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2002. 493pp. $9.95; US$7.95; £4.99. ISBN 155111 -028-8. Students at first often dislike Mansfield Park's Fanny Price, but are intrigued by the theatricals. Why is the usually obliging Fanny so adamant that she "cannot act" (p. 166)? And why does Sir Thomas burn "every unbound copy of 'Lovers' Vows' ... that met his eye" (p. 207)? While MansfieldPark invites questions, Pride and Prejudiceis seen as self-explanatory. Students initially fall into two categories in their response: those who like Pride and Prejudice because it is a love story, and those who do not because it is "just" a love story. Broadview Press is well known for its editions of canonical and noncanonical texts geared towards the undergraduate classroom, and June Sturrock's Mansfield Park and Robert P. Irvine's Pride and Prejudice are welcome additions to the Austen landscape, as they respond to the needs of the classroom and to current critical debates. Lionel Trilling felt confident that "Nobody, I believe, has ever found it possible to like the heroine ofMansfieldPark" ( The OpposingSelf: NineEssays in Criticism, 1955, p. 212), and many readers have agreed. Sturrock's engaging and comprehensive introduction vindicates Fanny Price: she emerges as a complex character with poignant vulnerability and admirable strength. Sturrock also draws attention to Fanny's comic foibles: Austen's heroine is not perfect and interesting parallels are made between Fanny Price and Marianne Dashwood, "with whom Fanny shares literaryardour and intensity offeelings" (p. 15), and even between Fanny and the youthful, quixotic Catherine Morland (the footnotes demonstrate the novel's richness in literary allusions). Sturrock presents a convincing psychological reason for Fanny's adherence to conduct-book ideals: Fanny "inevitably longs for the love and approval which she is consistently denied. The predictable result of this denial is that she learns rapidly to be 'a good girl'" (p. 13). Among the most compelling scenes in the novel are those in which Fanny does not do as she is told and refuses Henry Crawford. Fanny's conviction is attributed to her Christian faith (supported by selections from conduct-books and Jane Austen's prayers in appendix B), but it is also given a political edge. The novel is a "narrative of different forms ofresistance to the patriarchal values of Sir Thomas" (p. 22) and thus it "takes part in the long debate of the Romantic period about the permissible forms and extent ofauthority" (p. 23). Sturrock's context section for the theatricals is excellent: there are appropriate sections from Lovers' Vows and conduct-books, and Austen'sown REVIEWS325 participation in private theatricals is emphasized. The appendices also cover landscape improvements, the education of female characters, and slavery. While the range is admirable, there is an attempt to represent too many contemporary documents in fifty pages. Fewer, but longer, selections would allow students to examine the contemporary documents as complex texts, rather than as fairly flat "evidence" for the novel's themes. For example, the excerpt fromJoseph Lowe's An Inquiry into the State ofthe British West Indies consists ofonly six lines, and the appendix on women's education samples four sources in six pages. While Mansfield Park "is hardly conducive to romantic daydream" (Sturrock, p. 11), Pride and Prejudice seems to offer a romance more seductive , reassuring, and universal than any ofAusten's other novels. One glance at Irvine's detailed chronology of "Jane Austen and Her Time" administers an excellent corrective to the view that the novel is timeless. Irvine argues that the continued appeal oíPride andPrejudice is that it "represents afantasy of what England is like that is very familiar" and that this "fantasy has its roots in the peculiarly English social settlement of the eighteenth century, one which compromised between a system ofinherited social status and the sheer power of money" (p. 9). Irvine familiarizes students with Marilyn Butler's and Alistair Duckworth's readings of Austen in the context of Burke, and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,862
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,213
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismTravaux en français237 207