White Devil: A True Story of War, Savagery, and Vengeance in Colonial America (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: White Devil: A True Story of War, Savagery, and Vengeance in Colonial America Wayne Lee White Devil: A True Story of War, Savagery, and Vengeance in Colonial America. By Stephen Brumwell. Cambridge, Mass.: Da Capo Press, 2005. ISBN 0-306-81389-0. Maps. Notes. Appendixes. Index. Pp. 335. $27.50. Stephen Brumwell, fresh from a very successful study of the British army in America during the Seven Years' War (Redcoats, Cambridge University Press, 2002), has now turned his attention to one of that war's most famous characters: Robert Rogers. White Devil, however, is both more and less than a simple biography of Rogers and his rangers, it is a full study of the many characters and peoples involved in the campaigns leading up to Rogers's climactic raid on the Abenaki community of St. Francis in French Canada. Brumwell's focus on the St. Francis raid provides a compelling narrative thread, and allows for a complete "plot arc" worthy of any historical novel. White Devil opens with the captivity of Susanna Johnson—taken (with her family and others) from Fort Number Four in New Hampshire, and carried to St. Francis. Her eventual return home, and her new-built connections among the Abenaki, provide a satisfying dénouement. Brumwell, however, is no mere storyteller. Although beginning with a white captive, he quickly turns her experience into an opportunity to discuss the nature of the Abenaki community at St. Francis; a discussion carefully grounded in recent work on Native American history, but artfully done without a burdensome historiographical discussion. This is a quality that runs throughout the book. Brumwell frequently finds opportune moments for deeply informed topical discussions that fit comfortably within the narrative. After having thus laid some cultural and geographic foundations, Brumwell then turns to the outbreak of war and the growing reputations of Robert Rogers and the Abenakis of St. Francis. Both quickly became feared practitioners of wilderness warfare. Rogers provided skills and leadership for British forces sadly lacking in frontier scouts, while St. Francis, actually an ethnic polyglot of peoples, many of them refugees, served as a white hot center of resistance to English encroachment. The story's pace picks up as Brumwell recounts the early campaigns of the war, especially along the Hudson–Lake Champlain axis. One of the virtues of this section is the way in which the activities of Indians and Rogers's rangers are folded into the operations of the regular European troops. Their usefulness was not simply in conducting ambushes, or fighting from behind trees, but in their ability to move quickly and quietly through hundreds of miles of wilderness, take prisoners, and otherwise gather information about enemy intentions. Theirs was a war for information—a war sometimes fought with great savagery. The next four chapters recount the decision for the St. Francis raid (largely a project borne of vengeance), and the harrowing details of its execution: harrowing for the mostly old men, women, and children killed in St. Francis, and harrowing for the rangers forced in their return march hundreds of miles out of their way. Brumwell then concludes with a brief chapter outlining the conclusion of the war, including the personal failures and disappointments of Rogers in the postwar years. [End Page 228] Brumwell's intent here is to tell a dramatic story informed by the latest scholarship, including not only the relatively recently collected Abenaki oral histories and the discovery of Rogers's hand-drawn map of the raid, but also the sophisticated historical work now available on the nature of native societies and of wilderness warfare. In this purpose he is wildly successful. The book is a delight to read, and consistently reassuring in its depiction of current issues in the scholarship. Brumwell also hopes to rescue Rogers from military critics who have downplayed the rangers' effectiveness, but he makes no attempt to gloss over some of his more savage qualities; qualities that led the Abenakis to refer to him as a "white devil." This is a fine book, and while perhaps not designed for a graduate seminar, it could do very well for some undergraduate courses. The endnotes are nontraditional, but adequate for most purposes...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».