In-Situ Stress Magnitudes in the Alberta Basin-Regional Coverage for Petroleum Engineers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Knowledge of the stress regime is important for reservoir engineering. This paper presents stress magnitudes in Alberta and NE British Columbia at a regional scale. Overburden stresses (SV) and smaller horizontal principal stresses (SHmin) are mapped at the tops of the Viking Formation, Banff Formation and Wabamun Group, and at the base of the Cretaceous section. SV values are based on integration of more than 100 density logs. SHmin estimates are derived from microfracs, mini-fracs, leak-off tests and hydraulic fracture data from several hundred wells. Averaging techniques are used to achieve compatibility between SHmin data sources. The maps display regional southwestward increases in stress magnitudes that relate to depth of present and past burial. They also portray unanticipated local variations suggestive of low stress lineaments that may be sites of enhanced reservoir permeability. Although reconnaissance in nature, the results will be of value to petroleum engineers engaged in borehole stability prognoses, reservoir development and subsurface gas injection. Such information has not been available previously on a regional scale. Introduction Over the past few years, rock mechanics has been invoked increasingly in drilling prognoses and in engineering programs related to the recovery of hydrocarbons. Predicting and assessing the physical behaviour of subsurface rocks helps achieve significant savings in drilling and production costs, as well as enhancing reservoir performance. In order to apply rock mechanical analyses, it is necessary to specify the mechanical properties of the rocks and the physical conditions that confine them. The major confining force is subsurface stress; the lateral and vertical pressures applied to buried rocks. Predicting the conditions under which rocks will fail during drilling or during fluid injection requires principal stress magnitudes (Fjaer et al., 1992; Stjern et al., 2003). All other factors being equal, in situ stresses can control permeability (Brighenti, 1989; Enever et al., 1994; Sparks et al., 1995), so explorationists, as well production personnel, have an interest in their magnitudes. In the Alberta Basin of western Canada there are a limited number of direct stress magnitude measurements and a plethora of data from which estimates can be derived. Stress Magnitude Measurement and Estimation The state of stress at a point in the subsurface can be fully defined by the orientations and magnitudes of three orthogonal principal stresses: σ1, σ2, σ3. Since, by definition, principal stresses intercept free surfaces at right angles, and the Alberta Basin has a nearly flat topographic surface, it is reasonable to infer that one principal stress will be vertical (SV) and the other two will be horizontal (SHmin, SHmax). The magnitude of the vertical stress, SV, at depth is equal to the pressure exerted by the overlying rocks. Continuous values for specific sites were obtained by integrating density logs. Average densities of the uppermost unlogged intervals, and of any obviously erroneously recorded sections, were estimated from linear extrapolations of adjacent intervals (Fig. 1).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».