MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2059076225 · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.20036

Comparison of <i>in vitro</i> with <i>in vivo</i> characteristics of wear particles from metal–metal hip implants

2004· article· en· W2059076225 sur OpenAlex
Isabelle Catelas, John B. Medley, Pat Campbell, Olga L. Huk, J Bobyn

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Établissements canadiensMontreal General HospitalJewish General HospitalUniversity of WaterlooMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMaterials scienceLubricantParticle (ecology)MetalNanoparticleBiomedical engineeringComposite materialMetallurgyNanotechnologyMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The purpose of the present study was to compare wear particles isolated from metal-metal (MM) hip implants worn in an orbital bearing simulator with particles from similar MM total hip replacement (THR) implants worn in vivo. Comparison of these particles is important because it will help to assess the overall suitability of this type of hip simulator for reproducing in vivo wear and for producing physiological wear particles suitable for biological studies of in vitro cellular response. Commercial grade components made of ASTM F75 (cast) alloy were evaluated. Simulator tests were performed in 95% bovine calf serum with a 28-mm-diameter implant. Wear particles were collected from 0 to 0.25 million cycles (run-in wear period) and 1.75 to 2 million cycles (steady-state wear period). Tissues from seven patients with MM implants (surface replacement or stem type) were harvested at revision surgeries (after 1-43 months). Metal wear particles were isolated from serum lubricant or tissues using an enzymatic protocol that was previously optimized to minimize particle changes due to reagents. After isolation, particles were centrifuged, embedded in epoxy resin, and characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA). Results of EDXA on particles from the hip simulator primarily indicated a predominance of particles containing Cr and O but no Co (most likely chromium oxide particles), and fewer CoCrMo particles presenting varying ratios of Co and Cr. Image analysis of TEM micrographs demonstrated that the majority of the particles from the simulator were round to oval, but a substantial number of needle-shaped particles were also found, especially from 0 to 0.25 Mc. The particles generated from 0 to 0.25 Mc had an average length of 53 nm, whereas those generated from 1.75 to 2 Mc had an average length of 43 nm. In vivo, EDXA and TEM analysis of particles that were retrieved from two patients at 23 and 43 months respectively, revealed that they were the most comparable in composition, average length (57 nm), and shape to particles generated in the hip simulator during the run-in wear period. Because a large clinical retrieval study in the literature suggested that a run-in wear regime might occur in vivo for some 6-36 months, the fidelity of the simulator of the present study was strongly supported. However, some uncertainties existed, including the finding that the particles isolated from the other five patients generated from 1 month up to 15 months (shorter implantation times than the other two patients) were smaller and mostly contained only Cr and O (no Co). In the opinion of the authors, this particular very short term patient group was somewhat atypical. Therefore, despite these uncertainties, the present study was deemed to support the ability of the orbital bearing hip simulator to produce physiological wear particles.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,843

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,353
Écart entre enseignants0,302 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle