MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2059145368 · doi:10.1353/crt.2013.0031

At the Intersections of Mode, Genre, and Media: A Dossier of Essays on Melodrama

2013· article· en· W2059145368 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcie Frank

Notice bibliographique

RevueCriticism · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeMovie theaterArtLiteratureDramaFilm genrePraiseMode (computer interface)ModernityCriticismAestheticsPoliticsHistoryPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

At the Intersections of Mode, Genre, and Media:A Dossier of Essays on Melodrama Marcie Frank (bio) Melodrama has never yet been a term of praise, though its derogatory status has not stopped it from being broadly applied to print and playhouse, across live and film, video, and digitally recorded performances screened at drive-ins, shopping malls, or art-house cinemas, to nondramatic art forms such as novels and paintings, and even to other forms of social or political life susceptible to cultural and rhetorical analysis. We think we know what we mean when we use the term to describe exaggerated emotional manipulation, but slight definitional pressure reveals enormous variation. When theater historians tell the story of melodrama’s emergence in the wake of the French Revolution, they identify a modern, multimedia genre of drama featuring the integration into the plays themselves of music, dance, and pantomime—performance elements usually kept discreet—where they serve to amplify and diversify the play’s expressive capacities. Recent film criticism, by contrast, tends to treat melodrama as a mode that includes silent film and classic woman’s film, as well as aspects of westerns, buddy movies, and almost any other kind of narrative film. Apart from a recent suggestion that mode exists below, rather than above, genre—that is to say, that it works closer to the scene of human production—little attention has been paid to the relations between these categories.1 As either mode or genre, however, melodrama has been persistently associated with modernity, whether this is the modernity of cinematic technology or that of subjectivity ushered in by the French Revolution.2 Lauren Berlant has recently proposed that the contemporary films of precarity—those, that is, that dramatize “the impact of neo-liberalism on the everyday life of the formerly protected classes”—be understood as postmelodramatic because they explore what comes after the coimplication of the sentimental and liberalism in the fantasy of “the good life.”3 [End Page 535] Berlant treats melodrama less as a mode than as an ideologeme, and, as such, a periodizing tool, though its double status as both historical genre and transhistorical mode of representation makes this use somewhat tricky. We don’t need to decide whether our own moment is postmelodramatic to observe that perhaps the moonlit contours of melodrama are edging into visibility as the sun of modernist aesthetics sets. As one of the great disavoweds of modernism, under whose aegis we have been operating and to whose longevity even the by now more than twenty-year-old heralds of postmodernism themselves paradoxically attest, melodrama may have something to tell us about the status of such categories as media, mode, and genre as they contribute to standards of realism, as well as about modernist aesthetics. The role melodrama has played in the modern organization of literary and nonliterary forms and styles has yet to be fully theorized and described, in part because some of the most sophisticated work on it has taken place in different disciplines. The essays assembled in this issue of Criticism were written for an interdisciplinary workshop, funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, whose goals were to study melodrama in its historical emergence, as well as at other moments, including our own as a way to explore the terms media, mode, and genre, and their interrelations. Contributors each ruminate on texts of their choice and treat melodrama more or less explicitly as a mode, a genre, and/or a critical tool. To introduce what these essays do, I describe what the concept melodrama has been and can be used for. The goal is not to define melodrama for once and for all, nor to police its future uses but rather to see how it functioned as a multimedia genre in its moment of emergence, to identify its contributions as a mode to representation, and to examine its usefulness as a tool to enrich our critical practices. Melo-drame: the term was first used to signify dramatic speech accompanied by music but quickly came to signify dramatic performances that included dance and pantomime elements, in addition to the musical accompaniment of speech, as well as song...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,031

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,014
Communication savante0,0070,007
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCriticismMême sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207