MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2059604512 · doi:10.1111/acps.12116

Not always on the level: service provision for bipolar disorders

2013· article· en· W2059604512 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allan H. Young

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychoeducationBipolar disorderPsychiatryMedicinePsychological interventionTreatment of bipolar disorderMental healthHealth careFamily medicineManiaPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The current supplement of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica collates the outcomes of a 1-day standalone symposium (both supplement and symposium were sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb, including editorial support) on 3 November, 2011, in London, England, discussing how to set up a bipolar clinic within existing National Health Service (NHS) services in the UK. This supplement includes four papers – two clinical overview articles 1, 2 and two discussion articles 3, 4 – outlining and discussing the nature of bipolar disorder, disease progression and associated comorbidities, as well as potential routes to recovery through psychotherapeutic interventions delivered in bipolar clinics. The objective of the current supplement is to emphasise the need for bipolar clinics with psychoeducation programmes and provide useful hints for their implementation along with a successful real-life example. A workshop carried out during the symposium explored the first steps, challenges and possible barriers for the implementation of bipolar clinics. In addition, the supplement provides an overview of the history of bipolar disorder, physical health considerations associated with pharmacotherapy and the role of psychoeducation as add-on therapy to medication in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Psychiatric care for patients with bipolar disorder usually involves out-patient appointments with a psychiatrist or mental-health team member and long-term medication, with increased support or admission to hospital at times of relapse. However, hospitalisation during acute episodes places a great financial strain on healthcare services 5. Therefore, prevention of acute manic episodes rather than episode management could potentially reduce the financial burden on healthcare systems. Early diagnosis and pharmacotherapy coupled with psychological interventions that educate patients on how to monitor their symptoms and the importance of medication are key factors in the prevention of acute episodes. As a chronic mental illness, bipolar disorder can be managed with pharmacotherapy. However, the risk of developing chronicity through recurring episodes with incomplete remission is high. Young and Grunze 1 discuss studies showing that patients with bipolar disorder are at a high risk of developing medical comorbidities, such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes and cardiovascular disease 6, partly as a consequence of standard pharmacotherapy 7. Regular physical health monitoring is required for the prevention and management of comorbid conditions 8. In addition, many patients self-medicate or abuse substances in response to affective symptoms 9, ultimately leading to low quality of life and an increased physical health burden. Stafford and Colom 2 discuss psychoeducational programmes as a tool for the long-term management of bipolar disorder. As an intervention, psychoeducation aims to provide patients with knowledge about their illness and methods to prevent recurrence of episodes or the development of comorbidities. By increasing the patient's ability to manage their disorder, the goal is to instil a proactive attitude and enhance their competence to decide when to seek help. The goal of psychoeducation is to empower the patient to actively contribute to their care plan by learning how to recognise and handle destabilising factors, such as substance abuse and emotionally straining situations. This chapter highlights the importance of a functional relationship between the patient and clinician in the successful treatment of bipolar disorder, as well as the challenges and ideals of the development of bipolar clinics as a setting for the delivery of psychoeducation, and as an environment for regular interaction between the patient and clinician. Although considered beneficial for the patient, the challenges of setting up a bipolar clinic within existing NHS services are considerable. These are discussed by Young and Hale 3, and highlight the results of workshop discussions among the healthcare professionals attending the 1-day symposium. The considerations necessary to set up a bipolar clinic through the real-life set-up of a bipolar clinic in the UK are shared. Concerns of the workshop attendees revolved around the challenges of placing a bipolar clinic either within existing healthcare services or as a separate entity, as well as funding challenges, recognition as a legitimate clinical unit by fellow clinicians and the staff's additional training needs. The set-up of a UK bipolar clinic demonstrated that it is possible to manage clinician and patient expectations, and successfully implement a bipolar clinic within existing healthcare services. To conclude this supplement, Smith and Young 4 discuss the development of bipolar clinics and psychoeducation programmes, focusing on the differences in applicability and content of group- and web-based psychoeducation programmes used in the Bipolar Education Programme – Cymru 10. Although group-based psychoeducation enables patients to share experiences and engage in group-related therapy, web-based programmes have the advantage of reaching a geographically and demographically diverse patient population. Additional tools such as online exercises and smartphone applications represent a current record of patient mental stability and are beneficial during regular mental-health checks. Psychoeducation, in particular when delivered through a web-based platform, could reduce the cost of traditional treatment. Professor Allan H. Young is employed by Imperial College London. He is an Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist with WLMHT (NHS UK); has given paid lectures and advisory boards for all major pharmaceutical companies with drugs used in affective and related disorders; has no share holdings in pharmaceutical companies; was a Lead Investigator for the Embolden Study (AstraZeneca), BCI Neuroplasticity study and Aripiprazole Mania Study, and for investigator-initiated studies from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Wyeth. He has received grant funding (past and present) from NIMH (USA); CIHR (Canada); NARSAD (USA); Stanley Medical Research Institute (USA); MRC (UK); Wellcome Trust (UK); Royal College of Physicians (Edinburgh); BMA (UK); UBC-VGH Foundation (Canada); WEDC (Canada); CCS Depression Research Fund (Canada); and MSFHR (Canada) and is coholder of one European patent for the use of glucocorticoid antagonists in the treatment for depression.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,576
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,713

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa Psychiatrica ScandinavicaMême sujetBipolar Disorder and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207