The Ontario Cancer Institute: Successes and Reverses at Sherbourne Street (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Ontario Cancer Institute: Successes and Reverses at Sherbourne Street Shelley McKellar (bio) Ernest A. McCulloch . The Ontario Cancer Institute: Successes and Reverses at Sherbourne StreetMcGill-Queen's University Press2003. x,183. $60.00 Hospital histories are plentiful and range from commemorative, photoladen publications to extensively researched, scholarly studies. All have [End Page 416] their place, appealing to different audiences. This history of the Ontario Cancer Institute (OCI) will appeal to many readers owing to its focus on a disease-specific medical centre as well as its authorship by an OCI research pioneer. In this book, OCI researcher-physician Ernest A. McCulloch describes the growth of the Ontario Cancer Institute from a small cancer hospital to a large cancer treatment and research centre during its thirty-seven years on Sherbourne Street in Toronto. Officially named the Ontario Cancer Institute and Princess Margaret Hospital (OCI/PMH) upon its opening in 1958, the OCI was Canada's first dedicated cancer hospital. Its focus was cancer treatment, research, and education. Cancer patients traveled to the Princess Margaret Hospital for various forms of radiation therapy, which included the standard therapy machines, isotope machines using cobalt 60 or Cesium 137, and a 24 Mev betatron machine, as well as radium implant treatments. At the Ontario Cancer Institute, clinicians and scientists conducted research towards better treating and understanding cancer. Two main research areas were radiation therapy and cancer biology. Clinicians sought to improve treatment modalities while scientists investigated cancer cell mechanisms. At the OCI, collaboration among clinicians and scientists occurred often, and a significant amount of research success resulted. According to McCulloch, this was due to the 'unity and confidence' of those clinicians and scientists working at the OCI over the years. He highlights the early cancer research of Harold Johns, inventor of the cobalt bomb for radiation treatment; Arthur Ham, professor of histology at the University of Toronto; Gordon Whitmore, Jim Till, John Hunt, and Robert Bruce, who all studied the biological effects of radiation; Lou Siminovitch, who conducted DNA replication studies in animal cells; Allan Howatson, an electron microscopist; and Ernest McCulloch, a physician with a hematology interest. Later research contributors included Peter Ottensmeyer, UV photochemistry researcher; Ray Bush, a practising radiation oncologist; Tak Mak, T-cell receptor researcher; and others. Of particular note is the chapter on normal and malignant stem cells, in which McCulloch describes his own important research work. In the early 1960s, McCulloch and Till developed the first quantitative assay (or clonal method) for the identification of stem cells. Their method established the existence of stem cells and how they might be studied experimentally. Interestingly, this innovation was developed unintentionally; they were conducting experiments on the radiation sensitivity of normal marrow cells. McCulloch and Till continued to study blood cell development, pursuing research on hematopoietic cells found in bone marrow. Research innovation, according to McCulloch, was related to the strong leadership of the OCI. The author describes the organization's growth and challenges, such as its various directors, personnel changes, and university affiliations, but only briefly alludes to any personality conflicts, generational [End Page 417] differences, or institutional clashes. In several places the context of cancer research internationally or the culture of the research lab might have been helpful to the reader. For example, Hardi Cinader 'had a European concept of research organization,' suggesting questions about the nature of research collaboration or the uniqueness of the OCI? The quarrel between Alan Bernstein and Tak Mak was 'a rough spot,' which did not apparently interfere with either of their successful careers, but the nature and short-term impact of this quarrel is not clearly explained. As well, the continuities and changes in cancer patient care at the Princess Margaret Hospital (or elsewhere in Canada) are not covered in any depth in this book. Yet McCulloch touches upon several interesting issues, such as the problem of staff recruitment in the 1980s and the long waiting-list crisis for cancer treatment. These last remarks reflect this reader's interest in wanting to know more about the OCI/PMH. Academic historians will be frustrated by the lack of proper citations to the OCI/PMH annual reports, the OCI and OCTRF Role...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».