MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2059997107 · doi:10.1080/0950236x.2012.732417

Dying in a state of grace: memory, duality, and uncertainty in Margaret Atwood's<i>Alias Grace</i>

2012· article· en· W2059997107 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTextual Practice · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShort Stories in Global Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNarrativeLiteratureAliasHistoryIntertextualityArt historyArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Margaret Atwood's Alias Grace (1996) is examined in relation to her theorization of death and authorship in Negotiating With the Dead (2002). Broader theories of death, the author, and posthumous narration, as proposed by Roland Barthes, Alice Bennett, and others, are also employed. The novel is further linked to what Atwood herself calls a Jamesian form of ghost story, and is read alongside two stories by Henry James (‘The Jolly Corner’ (1908) and ‘The Middle Years’ (1893)). Elements of both the ghost story genre and the crime genre are shown to be used by Atwood to create a sense of uncertainty in the narrative structure of the novel. It is argued that this sense of uncertainty is part of Atwood's use of a sylleptic narrative structure to achieve an authorial position that keeps Author and scriptor simultaneously in play. Keywords: CrimedeathghostsHenry JamesMargaret Atwoodmemorymultiple personalityneo-VictorianPatricia CornwellRoland Barthes Acknowledgements The author thanks Susan Cahill, Brian Jackson, and Gerardine Meaney for their assistance. Notes Margaret Atwood, Alias Grace (London: Bloomsbury, 1996), hereafter cited as AG. Margaret Atwood, Negotiating With the Dead: A Writer on Writing (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), hereafter cited as NWD. E. M. Forster, Aspects of the Novel (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1962; reprint, 1970), p. 16. Coral Ann Howells, Margaret Atwood (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996), p. 64. Alice Bennett, ‘Unquiet Spirits: Death Writing in Contemporary Fiction’, Textual Practice, 23.3 (2009), pp. 463–479, p. 472. Rachel Falconer, Hell in Contemporary Literature: Western Descent Narratives Since 1945 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005). Bennett calls autothanatography ‘the opposite of autobiography’, arguing that the two are ‘intimately connected, with autothanatography figuring as the denied (but longed for) alternative to life writing’ (p. 463). Moreover, ‘In contemporary fictional autothanatographies posthumous voices are used for a fictional investigation of the ideal possibility of total biography and total knowledge, offering a retelling of a life that is apparently perfected by its completeness’ (p. 465). Roland Barthes, ‘The Death of the Author’, in Stephen Heath (ed. and trans.), Image-Text-Music (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), pp. 142–148, p. 145. Roland Barthes, ‘An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative’, trans. Lionel Duisit, New Literary History, 6.2 (Winter 1975), pp. 237–272, p. 263. Gérard Genette, Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method, trans. Jane E. Lewin (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983), pp. 196–197. The first-person narration is crucial to the novel: Atwood began the first draft in the third person but soon found that she could proceed only with Grace's voice present as a first-person narration. Mel Gussow, ‘The Alternate Personalities in an Author's Life and Art’, New York Times, December 30 (1996), pp. C9–C10, p. C9. Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, trans. Richard Howard (London: Vintage, 1993), pp. 95–96. Of this photograph of a condemned man, Barthes remarks, ‘I read at the same time: This will be and this has been; I observe with horror an anterior future of which death is the stake’ (p. 96; emphasis in original). Atwood's use of the word ‘commit’ hints at the connection of the criminal with the writerly. Harold Bloom, The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 140. Henry James, ‘The Jolly Corner’, in Leon Edel (ed.), The Complete Tales of Henry James (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1964), 12 vols. Vol 12, pp. 193–232. Henry James, ‘The Middle Years’, in Leon Edel (ed.), The Complete Tales of Henry James (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1964), 12 vols. Vol 9, pp. 53–76. Leon Edel, Dan H. Laurence, and James Rambeau, A Bibliography of Henry James, 3rd ed., Soho Bibliographies 8 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1982), pp. 160–161. Patricia Cornwell, Postmortem (London: Little, Brown Warner, 1998). One might suggest a comparison here with Wilkie Collins's 1868 work The Moonstone, the archetypal crime novel of disjointed personality, in which Franklin Blake functions as victim, investigator, and culprit, as well as supposed editor. Hayden White, ‘The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality’, Critical Inquiry, 7.1 (1980), pp. 5–27, p. 24. Atwood, discussing the composition of Alias Grace, remarks that ‘each historian picks out the facts he or she chooses to find significant, and every novel, whether historical or not, must limit its own scope’ (‘In Search of Alias Grace: On Writing Canadian Historical Fiction’, American Historical Review, 103.5 (1998), pp. 1503–1516, p. 1516), hereafter cited as ‘In Search’. Ian Hacking, Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995; reprint, 1998), p. 278, n 13.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,936
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,780

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle