Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (PAI) is joined in celebrating its 25th year by a scientific community of pediatric allergists/immunologists that has become global over the years. With this issue our journal can look back on a quarter of a century filled with remarkable development: 25 yr ago a few pioneers gathered as a working group, which was the basis of the European Society for Paediatric Allergy and Immunology (ESPACI). A few enthusiastic researchers from the United States, Japan, Australia, and other Asia–Pacific countries joined in to form a new platform, which was intended to facilitate communication about innovative research in our area of interest, to induce lively discussions, allow critical evaluation of controversial issues, and to announce the progress made in diagnosis and treatment of allergic and immune-mediated diseases, as well as provide novel ideas for the prevention and early intervention of allergies including asthma 1-15. At that time, allergology all over the world was considered to be a relatively new and consequently still weak discipline of clinical science. Therefore, not everyone shared the enthusiasm of pediatricians who thought that there were specific issues to address which would justify a subspecialty of allergology for pediatricians and a journal with a strong pediatric profile. The two editors in chief, Professor Bengt Björkstén from Linköping, Sweden and later Professor John Warner from London, UK, provided the basis of a successful development together with many key scientists from all over the world. Their professional expertise as well as their strong commitment turned out to be crucial for the remarkable success of the journal over the decades. Today it seems appropriate for me to ask some of the outstanding researchers, including the two past chief editors of our journal, to update the state of the art, express their opinions about our specialty and its current standing as well as give some advice for novel directions of research for the future 17-25. It appears that the scientific impact—the visibility as well as the global distribution of our journal—has developed in a really remarkable way, and many clinicians and scientists who have contributed a lot of effort and time over the years as reviewers, members of the editorial group or professionals working in the editorial office deserve credit for it. A special thanks goes to the Paediatric Section of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) as well as the junior members of our academy who became strong partners and supporters of our journal 16. For me, it is a great privilege to serve together with my editorial team in Berlin to make our journal even stronger in the future as the common platform of communication between clinicians and researchers, ensuring the very best for our patients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».