Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Henry Heath’s The Caricaturist’s Scrap Book Brian Maidment (bio) Henry heath’s The Caricaturist’s Scrap Book (1840?), a volume reprint of a range of separately published groups of comic images, was published in London, probably in 1840, by Charles Tilt (fig. 1).1 The book forms one of two gatherings of miscellaneous images that Heath published; the other, Tit-Bit’s Selected by H. Heath (fig. 2), published by James Reynolds, was also known by the less jocular but more usefully descriptive title Heath’s Comic Album—Five Hundred Humorous Etchings. Heath was a reasonably well known comic draughts-man, etcher, and engraver, who provided book and magazine illustrations and humorous prints to a rapidly expanding market for graphic images. The standard reference works refer to him, rather disparagingly, as “imitative” and “versatile,” although both qualities were necessary for survival in the roughhouse world of the competitive marketplace for print culture in the 1830s and 1840s.2 Both Scrap Book and Tit-Bit’s were made up of oblong folio sheets of images set on the page in a variety of different ways—a mass of tiny vignettes, a large central image surrounded by smaller satellite ones, or four reasonably large and detailed images laid out on the paper as an upright grid. The images, accordingly, ranged in size from large to tiny. The two immediate impressions given to the reader are of profusion and miscellaneity, the first engendered by the massed presence of tiny and hastily executed sketches on many pages, as well as the “five hundred” images advertised on the title page of Tit-Bit’s, and the second by the apparently inconsequential marshalling of disparate images onto single sheets. Indeed, the potential miscellaneity of Heath’s publications is stressed, and even celebrated, by his chosen titles and subtitles—scraps, tit-bits, and even the more ambitious “omnium gatherum” (fig. 3)—which evoke the diversionary, the trivial, the fun, and the inconsequential. [End Page 13] Click for larger view View full resolution Fig. 1. Title page of Henry Heath, The Caricaturist’s Scrap Book (London: Charles Tilt n.d. [c.1840]). Click for larger view View full resolution Fig. 2. Title page of Henry Heath, Tit-Bit’s Selected by H. Heath (London: James Reynolds n.d. [c.1840]). [End Page 14] Click for larger view View full resolution Fig. 3. Title page of Henry Heath, “Omnium Gatherum,” reprinted as part of The Caricaturist’s Scrap Book. Beyond this immediate sense of unanalyzed and accidental contiguity (a principle appropriate to a scrapbook), organizational categories can be identified. It becomes clear from more sustained scrutiny that the plates of which these two volumes are comprised were first published as short sequences loosely organized by thematic proximity and are here being republished in order to fully exploit their commercial potential. Thus, the six plates that make up the “Nautical Dictionary” sequence all rely on punning visual reinterpretations of common nautical terms—“Gather way” shows an alarmed woman on a runaway horse; “Hulk” depicts a retired sailor who has lost both legs and an eye in service enjoying a pipe and a glass of grog; “Rummage the Hold” shows two muggers going through the pockets of a respectable woman. In images like these, a characteristically Regency delight in visual-verbal puns, in which a comic visual incident destabilizes common vernacular phrases, is maintained but is subjected to a scaling down in the size and satiric energy of the image. There are a number of reasons to regard The Caricaturist’s Scrap Book as marking an important moment in the history of the making and marketing of graphic comedy. First, it offered one answer to an important question that artists and publishers were asking in the 1820s and 1830s—what was to replace the engraved or etched single-plate political caricature as the commodity most likely to succeed in a rapidly growing marketplace for comic images? Second, it suggested, in however fantasized a form, a vision of [End Page 15] reading practices for visual humour that was centred on the family, on domesticity, and on “fun” rather than on satire, wit, and male sociability. Third, The Caricaturist’s Scrap...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».