Review of Standards for Evaluating Coatings to Control External Corrosion of Pipelines
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT Coatings are the first line of defence against external corrosion of pipelines and, when they fail, cathodic protection (CP) acts as the backup. Because of their importance, a variety of coating properties are evaluated and standards developed. The standards used in North America for evaluating external pipeline coatings on pipelines are reviewed in this paper. These standards have been developed by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM), the American Water Works Association (AWWA), the Canadian Standards Association (CSA), the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE), and the Society of Protective Coating (SSPC). Limited information on standards used in Europe and elsewhere is also presented in this paper. There is good understanding in the industry of the important properties that have a detrimental effect on pipeline coating behavior, and several standards are available to test these properties. Some coating properties for which different standards have essentially the same requirements include blast cleaning, surface profile, penetration resistance, chemical resistance, dielectric strength, electrical conductivity, and impact resistance. Properties for which standards from different organizations have different requirements include cathodic disbondment, adhesion, cohesion, water permeation, flexibility, and abrasion resistance. These properties are also important for coating performance; thus harmonization of the standards used to evaluate these properties would be very useful. Properties for which no adequate standards have been developed include: quantification of visual and non-visual contaminations of steel surface, pH measurements at the disbonded coatings, blister formation, holiday detection using above-ground techniques, and compatibility and repairability of joint and mainline coatings. Properties for which adequate standards are available but are not utilised in the standards to evaluate pipeline coatings include: microbial resistance, weathering, gas permeation, and freeze-thaw stability. Correlation of performance of coatings in standard tests and in the field has not been well documented, nor is such a correlation a specified requirement in any of the standards. To date, no studies have been successful in establishing a correlation between field performance and performance in standard tests. Development of a capability to predict long-term coating performance from test data established in short-term standard tests is an industry priority.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle