Red Riding Hood and the Wolf in Bed: Modernism's Fairy Tales (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Red Riding Hood and Wolf in Bed: Modernism's Tales. By Ann Martin. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. 199 pp., bibliography, index. Modernisms Tales, subtitle of Ann Martin's book, raises expectations of critique. Many of artists and commonly associated with European modernism were attracted to what we could call fairy-tale thinking in particular, faith in a happily ever after. On one hand there's polemical new beginnings of likes of futurism and imagism, credos of which posit a slate wiped clean of accumulated works of recent history; on other, projected ever afters of more radically conservative modernists, for whom recently literate and urbanized masses needed herding - or worse - in interests of a new order of elite. That these very masses might be reading fairy tales, and so perpetuating threat of a tide of popular culture, is only one of many ironies of modernism's dangerously Utopian tendencies. Red Riding Hood and Wolfin Bed doesn't quite follow this line, but it's an indication of richness of conjunction of modernism and fairy tale that it should give rise to a host of interpretative possibilities. conjunction itself is wonderfully unexpected, leading this reader to imagine a series of similarly counterintuitive meetings: Romanticism and Circus? Nouveau Roman and Folktale? Myth is a far more common pairing for modernism, stemming from T S. Eliot's infamously tendentious essay on mythical method employed in Joyce's Ulysses. Martin rather sidesteps this dominant paradigm, but again, her attention is directed elsewhere. central three chapters of book chart allusions to and dealings with specific canonical fairy tales in work of three modernist writers: James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, and Dj una Barnes. rationale and justification for such a project is made at various points in course of a long and wide-ranging first chapter dealing with history of fairy tale - in particular, during nineteenth century, and so with genre as it was inherited by modernist artists. Martin suggests that fairy tale is more than simply one of many worldly objects swept up in net of encyclopedic modernist text. fairy tale is more than just another of modernism's intertexts. In terms of content, central tales discussed Sleeping Beauty, Little Red Riding Hood, Cinderella, Beauty and Beast, The Fisherman and His Wife, and Snow White - explore individual's role in a modern urban society. They are predicated upon dynamics of consumerism and subject's performance of a gendered, classed identity . . . texts that reflect and convey modern attitudes towards sexuality, social mobility, urbanity, and commodity culture (17). That is, genre of fairy tale, together with its constituent dramas, is singularly entangled in very discourses of with which modernist were engaged, from commerce and market to fashion and commodity, together with conflicting attractions of tradition and innovation. For Martin, Fairy tales come to reflect . . . fluctuating experience of . . . and most importantly, agency of subject in a modern consumer society (40). In addition to these social and historical matters, Martin also makes a general claim for genre of fairy tale as peculiarly related to modernism. Beginning with reference to the multiple interpretative possibilities that texts represent for modernist writers (8), she goes on to offer a significant proposal: It is fairy tale's involvement in multiple contexts that marks its potential as a system of reference in work of Joyce, Woolf, and Barnes. In their instability and variety, fairy tales open up a space for reader in text. . . . [F] airy tales are used by Joyce, Woolf, and Barnes as modernist works; that is, as texts that reflect instability and variability that is experience of modernity (12). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».