A framework of design weakness detection through machine health monitoring for the evolutionary design optimization of multi-domain systems
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Design of a multi-domain engineering system can be complicated due to its complex structure and dynamic coupling between domains. Ideally, designing a multi-domain system should be done in an integrated and concurrent manner, where dynamic interactions between domains in the entire system have to be considered simultaneously, throughout the design process. In recent years, researchers have made some progress in the integrated and optimal design of multi-domain systems. Dynamic modeling tools such as Bond Graphs and Linear Graphs have been considered for modeling multi-domain systems, which can facilitate the design process. In the process of design optimization, a rather challenging task is to concurrently satisfy multiple design objectives. Methods of evolutionary computing, genetic programming in particular, have received much attention in recent years for application in design optimization. These methods can be extended to evolutionary optimization, which may involve complex and non-analytic objective functions and a variety of design specifications. More recently, machine health monitoring system (MHMS) has been considered for integration into the scheme of design evolution even though no concrete developments have made in this regard. In this paper, a framework of design weakness detection through machine health monitoring for evolutionary design optimization of multi-domain system is proposed. MHMS is integrated with evolutionary design optimization to make the overall process of design evolution more effective and feasible from the practical point of view. Information form MHMS is utilized to detect the “sites” or “candidates” of design weakness, which will involve computation of a new measure that can reflect the quality of the current design. These candidates of design weakness are then provided to the process of evolutionary design optimization. On subsequent analysis, design improvements would be made only if these candidates were found to be related to design weaknesses. Otherwise, the monitoring process will continue. Supervised design weakness detection is achieved through the integrated system of MHMS and evolutionary design optimization. In addition, a Design Expert System is employed to monitor and assist both design weakness detection and isolation, and feasible design selection.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle