An overview on the recent advances in computational fluid dynamics simulation of spouted beds
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Spouted beds are now widely applied in various physical operations and chemical reaction systems due to their unique structural and flow characteristics. Now there are growing interests to use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to understand dense gas–solid two‐phase flows in spouted beds. Both Eulerian–Eulerian (two‐fluid model, TFM) and Eulerian–Lagrangian (discrete element method, DEM) approaches can be applied to the CFD modelling of spouted beds and spouted‐fluidised beds, and numerous verification studies have shown their reliabilities. This overview summarises the recent advances of the TFM and DEM approaches in the CFD modelling of spouted beds. The typical flow patterns of spouted beds can be well reproduced by both the TFM and the DEM approaches, and the simulated characteristic properties such as spout diameter, minimum spouting velocity and voidage profile are in good agreement with experimental data, indicating that CFD modelling based on the TFM and DEM approaches can serve as an important tool for predicting gas and solids behaviour in spouted beds. The TFM approach has been widely used in phenomenological studies that are mainly towards the understanding of the flow behaviour of the whole system. Although more computational capacity is required, the DEM approach offers a more natural way to simulate gas–solid flows, with each individual particle tracked in the simulation and can be applied readily for particle tracking, collision, mixing, circulation and mass transfer studies that are aimed at obtaining the profound particle‐scale understanding in fluid–solid multiple‐phase systems. However, each approach has its own limitations and defects. The complex nature of the TFM‐based simulation framework requires both proper descriptions of pseudo‐fluid properties like solid pressure, solid viscosity, solid friction stresses, etc. and suitable choice of drag models, and the boundary conditions also have effects on the simulation results. Moreover, the effects of these factors often interact with each other, which require even more subtle skills in conducting a simulation. In the DEM approach, the high computing source requirement limits its application of no more than several million particles. Furthermore, more insight investigation should be given to the acting mechanism of several forces on particles. One common challenge for these two approaches is to properly describe the inherent turbulence for both the solid and gas phases, especially for the spout region. Further fundamental and experimental studies on the kinematic properties of the two phases are needed to improve the accuracy of the CFD models.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».