The handbook of election news coverage around the world - Edited by Jesper Strömbäck & Linda Lee Kaid
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This handbook offers a sustained look at news coverage of elections around the world. The initial chapter lays out issues concerning media and governmental systems around the world, appropriately stressing the interdependence of these systems. Then the editors convincingly explain why news coverage of political campaigns is an important topic for scholarship. The chapters that follow provide considerable information about the governments, the media, and the news coverage of election campaigns in 22 countries and the European Union Parliamentary elections. The final chapter works to draw together the threads used to open the book; the editors offer insightful conclusions about the chapters covered in the book. The chapters of this book vary in the choice of specific topics covered. Many chapters provide a discussion of the historical development of governmental and media systems in a country—an important feature because few scholars are likely to be equally knowledgeable about the many countries covered in this handbook. Chapters offer different levels of attention to the framework presented in the introductory chapter. Some chapters offer previously unpublished data (e.g., the chapters on Brazil, Poland, or Sweden); some chapters report data from published sources (such as the chapters about Germany, Italy, or the Netherlands); others offer more of a narrative literature review (e.g., the chapters covering Canada, India, or Serbia). Many chapters offer tables, figures, or charts reporting data, although others lack these features. News frames (horse race, issue, and scandal) are discussed in over half of the chapters; agenda-setting, priming, polling, media effects, negativity of coverage, personalization of campaigns, and bias of coverage appear in fewer than half of the chapters. A table in the concluding chapter (26.2) which summarizes results from the earlier chapters notes that we need to interpret this table “with caution” because definitions and approaches” for content analysis of type of coverage (news frames) vary across chapters. A trivial example of these chapters' heterogeneity, but one which illustrates the point, concerns how the various tables report data over time. Some tables present data from earlier years in the left-most data column and recent years on the right-most data column; some of the tables reverse this order. Other tables are organized so years appear in rows rather than in columns. Of course, to some extent, a diversity of approaches and topics is inevitable given the variety of governmental and media systems along with the widely disparate amounts of literature available about election news coverage in these countries. However, greater consistency in focus of the chapters would have strengthened this collection and helped readers develop comparisons between chapters, making similarities and trends easier to identify.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle