A Variety of Literary and Artistic Styles: Contemporary Canadian Picture Books
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A Variety of Literary and Artistic Styles:Contemporary Canadian Picture Books Bettina Kümmerling-Meibauer (bio) Andrews, Jan. The Twelve Days of Summer. Illus. Susan Jolliffe. Victoria: Orca, 2005. 32 pp. $19.95 hc. ISBN 1-55143-365-6. Print. Chartrand, Lili. Taming Horrible Harry. Illus. Rogé. Trans. Susan Ouriou. Toronto: Tundra, 2006. 32 pp. $22.99 hc. ISBN 978-0-88776-777-2. Print. Kovalski, Maryann. Take Me Out to the Ballgame. Markham, ON: Fitzhenry & Whiteside, 2006. 32 pp. $9.95 pb. ISBN 1-55041-899-8. Print. McNaughton, Janet. Brave Jack and the Unicorn. Illus. Susan Tooke. Toronto: Tundra, 2005. 32 pp. $22.99 hc. ISBN 0-88776-677-3. Print. Newhouse, Maxwell. Let's Go for a Ride. Toronto: Tundra, 2006. 32 pp. $22.99 hc. ISBN 0-88776-748-6. Print. Reid, Barbara. Read Me a Book. Markham, ON: North Winds, 2003. 32 pp. $14.99 hc. ISBN 0-439-95726-5. Print. Solomon, Evan. Bigbeard's Hook. Illus. Bill Slavin. Toronto: Viking Canada, 2005. 32 pp. $16.00 hc. ISBN 0-670-06386-X. Print. Nathaniel McDaniel and the Magic Attic 1. [End Page 166] Thornhill, Jan. Over in the Meadow. Toronto: Maple Tree, 2004. 32 pp. $19.95 hc. ISBN 1-897066-08-2. Print. Toews, Mary. Black-and-White Blanche. Illus. Dianna Bonder. Markham, ON: Fitzhenry & Whiteside, 2006. 32 pp. $19.95 hc. ISBN 1-5505-132-6. Print. Wilson, Budge. A Fiddle for Angus. Illus. Susan Tooke. Toronto: Tundra, 2006. 32 pp. $14.99 pb. ISBN 0-88776-785-0. Print. Wilson, Troy. Frosty is a Stupid Name. Illus. Dean Griffiths. Victoria: Orca, 2005. 32 pp. $19.95 hc. ISBN 1-55143-383-6. Print. Authors and artists of picture books have done imaginative work in a great variety of literary and artistic styles, reflecting tastes in both the fine arts and popular culture.1 The potentiality of modern picture books for innovation has been stressed in the groundbreaking studies of Lewis, Nikolajeva and Scott, and Nodelman, which emphasize the demanding quality of the text-picture relationship. As David Lewis suggests, "One of the reasons pictorialization—the promiscuous mixing together of words and images—is able to shake loose generic bonds and derail expectations, is that it enables the picture book to look in two directions at once and sometimes permits the picture-book makers to play off one perspective or view against another" (68). This statement concerns not only picture books from England, France, Germany, Sweden, or the United States, to name just a few countries, but also from Canada, whose picture-book production has increased during the last few decades. Nevertheless, Canadian picture-book artists are hardly known in Europe. While the reasons for this development are manifold and cannot be analyzed in detail here, a short overview of the influence of Canadian children's literature in Germany in general, and on the reception of Canadian picture books in particular, should reveal the preconditions for my examination, as a German scholar invited to write a review article about eleven recently published Canadian picture books. "I saw, heard and was conquered by the excellence and manyfoldedness of Canadian children's literature." With this modification of Julius Caesar's famous citation, the English lecturer Hamish Fotheringham enthusiastically praised the high standards of children's books in Canada (5). Nevertheless, his project of an exhibition of modern Canadian children's books in the International Youth Library in Munich has never been realized, nor, indeed, his idea of publishing Dennis Lee's poems in German translation (see Seifert and Weinkauff 938). Although children's books from [End Page 167] English-speaking countries have dominated the German book market since the 1960s, familiarity with Canadian children's literature is generally restricted to classic adventure stories and animal stories by writers like Ernest Seton Thompson, Charles Roberts, Grey Owl, Farley Mowat, Sheila Burnford, and James Houston. Nowadays, the best-known Canadian children's book author is Lucy Maud Montgomery. Astonishingly, the Anne of Green Gables series was not translated into German until 1986, almost eighty years after the first Canadian edition. But because the Canadian made-for-television miniseries of 1985 has aired on German television...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».