MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2060914722 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2014.0005

Comedy, Caricature and the Social Order, 1820–50 by Brian Maidment (review)

2014· article· en· W2060914722 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Patrick Leary

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComicsComedyNarrativeAfterlifeOrder (exchange)ArtSocial orderLiteratureArt historyHistoryPoliticsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Comedy, Caricature and the Social Order, 1820–50 by Brian Maidment Patrick Leary (bio) Brian Maidment, Comedy, Caricature and the Social Order, 1820–50 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013), pp. x + 223, $105/£70 cloth. Brian Maidment’s important new book pushes back an ingrained habit of scholarly contempt for the popular comic art of the 1820s and 1830s. That condescension is rooted in a narrative that sees a tragic falling-off from the achievements of single-plate caricature under such masters as Rowlandson and Gillray, dwindling under the pressures of a widening consumer marketplace into a smattering of small jokes about small matters in fugitive and forgettable comic papers. Maidment counters this narrative by highlighting the restlessly experimental creative energies attending the explosive growth of a “middlebrow” market for visual culture and expressed through such key reprographic methods as lithography and wood engraving. His book explores these protean changes as reimaginings and adaptations of a new set of commercial pressures and incentives, with a new focus on social relationships. Maidment begins by describing the long afterlife of Regency caricature, pointing out that many of these supposedly transient comic images were present in the Victorian visual imagination throughout the nineteenth century, avidly collected and frequently reprinted in one form after another, often with additions and substitutions and reworkings that would have startled their originators. Images that were originally published as a series of stand-alone plates might be reordered and reassembled into a narrative, with text added or juxtaposed in new ways. Floating free from their original settings, the work of artists like Kenny Meadows, Robert Seymour, and Henry Heath reappeared in unexpected settings, telling different stories. [End Page 146] Maidment’s favorite example of such reappropriation is Seymour’s Sketches, whose original stand-alone lithographic plates, first published from 1834 to 1836, were reprinted, redrawn, and reissued in various formats for new audiences during the Victorian era, becoming a touchstone for visual satire. As the most influential inheritor of these traditions, Punch followed a similar pattern within twenty years of its debut in 1841, repackaging its illustrations for audiences new and old, a process that continues to this day. In emphasizing this remarkable persistence, Maidment introduces a theme that recurs throughout the book: the crucial adaptability of Regency comic art, its “openness to reappropriation” made possible by the nature of the comic vignette as it evolved in the 1820s and 1830s to serve a reading audience that was increasingly interested in adapting imagery to its own purposes (34). The same openness that made this longevity possible, Maidment argues, was part of the original appeal of this evolving form. A key part of the book’s fascinating exploration of the popular subgenres of comic art is the craze for “scraps,” which commonly took the form of brightly colored lithographic images that could be bought by the sheet, cut out, and pasted into albums (hence, “scrapbooks”). Caricaturists soon got into the business with such productions as George Cruikshank’s Comic Composites for the Scrapbook (1821) and Scraps and Sketches (1828–32) as well as Henry Heath’s The Caricaturist’s Scrap Book (1834), which repackaged previously issued drawings to exploit the new fad. Periodicals themselves responded to the demand by adopting formats that made it easy for readers to assemble their own books by cutting and pasting, a process that, as Maidment shrewdly observes, allowed those readers to turn the deliberately ephemeral productions of comic serials into permanent possessions. The discussion of scraps appears in the book’s long third chapter, “Continuity, Innovation and Change, Comic Visual Culture 1820–1850,” a masterful overview that should henceforth be required reading for all students of nineteenth-century popular culture. The small miseries of middle-class urban life were an unfailingly popular theme for generations of comic artists, and Maidment traces this theme from its mainly textual expression in the first decade of the century to the surging popularity of woodcut vignettes by the best-known artists of the day and the proliferation of comic magazines and pamphlets. One favorite and often neglected medium for this new illustrative energy is the songbook, which moved from a textual object with occasional prints to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,150
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetGothic Literature and Media AnalysisTravaux en français237 207