Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Thank you for printing the outstanding collection of articles about tobacco and health disparities in the February 2004 issue of the Journal. Although most of tobacco’s deleterious health effects are long-term, smoking materials remain the leading cause of fatal fires in the United States, causing roughly one quarter of home fire deaths. One study compared the demographic characteristics of smokers whose cigarettes had started a fire with those of smokers who had not had a fire. Households with incomes of less than $10 000 accounted for 45.6% of smokers who had had fires and only 16.6% of smokers who had not. Smokers who were not high school graduates accounted for 38.3% of smokers who had had fires and only 18.4% of those who had not.1 Not surprisingly, states with larger percentages of adults lacking high school diplomas and households below the poverty level tend to have higher fire death rates.2 Barbeau et al. showed that these factors are also correlated with smoking.3 Smoking bans protect health, but they also protect property. Fee and Brown described the positive effect that hospital smoking bans had on the hospital environment and the smoking behavior of hospital employees.4 Hospital fires started by smoking materials fell by 96%, from 3200 in 1980 to 130 in 1998. In 1980, these fires accounted for 40% of hospital fires. In 1998, the figure was only 8% (Ahrens M, unpublished data, 2004). I had to do a mental shift when reading Fairchild and Colgrove’s article on the “safer” cigarette.5 The fire safety community is strenuously advocating legislative requirements for self-extinguishing cigarettes. While such cigarettes would not eliminate all cigarette fires, they would substantially reduce the number of fires caused by smoldering cigarettes. The National Fire Protection Association is in the harm reduction camp. Until smokers quit, we want them to use a product with reduced risk. Because quitting often takes numerous attempts, we advocate cigarettes that are less prone to ignition, products that are less flammable, and education about smoking practices that are less likely to start fires. Difficult questions arise when someone receiving supplemental medical oxygen continues to smoke. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations discussed the root causes of 11 fires involving home medical oxygen in the article “Lessons Learned: Fires in the Home Care Setting.”6 Many caregivers, agencies, and fire departments are struggling with this issue. Smoking is a significant part of the fire and injury problem. Preventing smoking will prevent fire deaths. We applaud the efforts taken to identify the most effective strategies and hope that Journal readers will consider including fire prevention in their programs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».