MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2061556548 · doi:10.1177/1715163513508914

Expanded pharmacy practice: Where are we, and where do we need to go?

2013· article· en· W2061556548 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jeff Morrison

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Établissements canadiensCanadian Pharmacists Association
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPharmacyMedicinePharmacy practiceMedical educationFamily medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The issue of an expanded role for pharmacists is not new—it has been a key priority for most pharmacy associations in Canada for several years and lies at the heart of the Blueprint for Pharmacy. When we observe the lay of the land on this issue, there are 2 dominant themes: One, most pharmacists probably do not appreciate the significant progress that has been made in expansion of pharmacists’ scope of practice and payment for medication management services in a relatively short period of time. Two, despite this progress, there remain serious gaps in the practice model that must be addressed before pharmacists will be in a position to properly deliver expanded health care services to Canadians. Filling in these gaps remains a top advocacy priority for pharmacy associations, and several initiatives are underway in that regard. Although each jurisdiction in Canada is at a different stage in its evolution of expanding pharmacy services, the overall trend lines are clearly in the right direction. As Figure 1 demonstrates, most jurisdictions have adopted regulatory changes that permit pharmacists to provide a much greater range of services. This chart would have looked much emptier just a few years ago. By embracing these services, governments are sending a clear signal that they understand and support the position that pharmacists can offer accessible, quality care in a number of service areas, often at less cost than the typical physician or hospital setting. Figure 1: Summary of pharmacists’ expanded scope of practice activities across Canada So what are the barriers to pharmacists’ ability to provide high-quality, expanded care, and what is being done to overcome these? Unfortunately, there are still many barriers, but they must be addressed if we want pharmacists to practise to their full scope. These include the following: Lack of adequate compensation to perform the service (or, in some jurisdictions, no compensation at all). Lack of a team-based approach with other health providers (many physicians in particular remain unconvinced about the value that pharmacists can deliver). Lack of private insurance/third-party payer coverage for expanded pharmacist-provided services. Lack of uniformity or standardization of scope of practice and funded services between Canadian jurisdictions. Weak electronic communications infrastructure (i.e., Electronic Health Records, in particular Drug Information Systems and electronic prescribing), which prevent pharmacists’ interventions from being shared and communicated with other providers. Low levels of understanding among the general public that pharmacists are able to provide these new services. Pressures on the pharmacy business model, precipitated by lower generic drug prices, making it difficult for pharmacists to retain the capacity to deliver high-quality expanded services. Lack of confidence by some frontline pharmacists, and the challenge in getting pharmacy owners to embrace new services to improve patient outcomes. Several articles in this issue of CPJ touch on this. Clearly, these are not easy barriers to overcome, nor can they all be dealt with on a national basis. However, several initiatives are underway aimed directly at addressing some of these barriers. These include the following: CPhA has been actively involved over the past year with the Council of the Federation’s (CoF) Health Care Innovation Working Group. At the CoF meeting in July 2013, the Premiers asked the working group to examine opportunities within the team-based model framework to increase the important role that paramedics and pharmacists can play in providing frontline services. We are currently working with officials to identify for health ministers innovative, leading edge practices in expanded pharmacist service delivery with the aim of encouraging all jurisdictions to implement similar leading edge practices. Initial reports from provincial officials have been positive, and we look forward to working with the ministers to identify how services can be more effectively implemented. These efforts include a focus on the need for fair and adequate compensation in the delivery of services. The Pharmacy Advisory Committee on Private Payers, a joint committee of CPhA and the Canadian Association of Chain Drug Stores, is engaging with private payers to convince them to extend coverage plans to include new pharmacist-provided services. CPhA will be engaging more closely with the Canadian Medical Association and Canadian Nurses Association to promote a team-based approach to delivery of various new services. Starting with the introduction of Pharmacists Awareness Month in March 2013, there will be a continued focus on promoting to the general public the changes in services that pharmacists can now offer. Earlier in 2013, CPhA and the Canadian Medical Association issued a joint statement on e-prescribing that calls on implementation of full e-prescribing capability by 2015. We will continue to work with other practitioner groups, governments and other stakeholders to continue advancing this goal. Several provincial pharmacy associations have issued reports calling for expanded pharmacy services to be implemented and compensated in their respective jurisdictions. At a national level, earlier this year the Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association and the Canadian Association of Chain Drug Stores issued a report titled 9000 Points of Care, which made a strong case for service expansion within pharmacy. The Blueprint for Pharmacy Steering Committee has identified the top 10 strategic priorities for moving the profession forward to achieve the Vision for Pharmacy. Examples of priorities include a national public relations campaign, incorporating new patient care services into the business model and clinical decision support software for documentation of patient care. Action plans and fundraising strategies will support progress. So where does this all leave pharmacists? Overall, it is clear that pharmacists are on the right track—the vision of pharmacy as a more patient-centred profession is being realized, albeit perhaps not as uniformly or quickly as some would like. However, it is clear that barriers remain that must be overcome. It will take time, effort and resilience to tackle these barriers, but your national and provincial associations are actively working on strategies and initiatives designed to move pharmacists ever closer to the point where they will be able to practise to the fullest extent possible in order to deliver optimal quality care to Canadians. ■

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,868
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,700

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,026
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0200,022
Communication savante0,0250,025
Science ouverte0,0040,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0090,024
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,091
Tête enseignante GPT0,367
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2013
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du CanadaMême sujetPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesTravaux en français237 207