233 NON-CROSS-CONTAMINATION OF BOVINE EMBRYOS WITH MICROBES USING THE OPS VITRIFICATION SYSTEM
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Here we report on the outcome of the application of vitrification open pulled straw (OPS) technology on the sanitary status of embryos exposed to pathogenic agents and cryopreserved using the commercial kit Vit-SeT® (Minitube Canada, Ingersoll, Ontario, Canada). The Vit-SeT consists of 3 stainless steel chambers: the first for cooling the 0.5-mL AI straws, the second for vitrification of OPS straws, and the third for loading OPS into the AI straws. The CBC 0.5-mL straws (Cryo Bio System, Paris, France), OPS straws (Minitube Canada), and the heat sealer were used. The investigation involved: (1) pressure seal testing the CBC straws; (2) testing LN for contamination after vitrification; (3) testing the surface of the CBC straws; and (4) testing the contents of OPS straws and vitrified embryos for cross-contamination. In the first Exp., CBC straws were heat sealed at one end and the other end was connected to a compressor with a manometer. The straws were then tested for air leaks in water. In Exp. 2, OPS straws were loaded by capillary aspiration of clean or contaminated cultures (3 × 108 E. coli , 13 × 108 P. aeruginosa , or 105 BVDV TCID50 mL-1, NY strain), then vitrified in LN (chamber 2) in random order, inserted into the CBC straws (chamber 3), and heat sealed at a reading of 225 on the sealer dial. In Exp. 3, IVF embryos were either exposed or not to the microbe cultures for 1 h, loaded into OPS (5 embryos per straw), and then vitrified and processed as described in Exp. 2. After vitrification, OPS straws were retrieved from CBC straws and thawed according to the original methodology (Vajta et al . 1997 Cryo-Lett. 18, 191–195). For bacterial isolation, standard methodology was used, and BVDV was detected by virus isolation followed by immunoperoxydase staining. In Exp. 1, no air leaks were detected up to 20 mm Hg pressure at the heat-sealed end of CBC straws ( n = 15). In Exp. 2, two samples of LN tested positive for E. coli (after immersion of 10 OPS, chamber 2). All remaining samples of LN after vitrification of OPS tested negative for pathogenic agents. Surfaces of the 0.5-mL straws all tested negative (chamber 3). The pathogenic agents were retrieved from all of the positive control OPS straws ( n = 15). In Exp. 3, all tested samples of LN and surfaces of 0.5-mL straws were negative. The pathogenic agents retrieved from samples of control embryos previously exposed to pathogens were as follows: E. coli , 5/15; P. aeroginosa , 8/15; and BVDV, 2/15. All samples containing embryos not exposed to pathogens, surfaces of 0.5-mL straws, and LN all tested negative. On the basis of limited experimental work, it is concluded that the potential for cross-contamination of samples by application of the Vit-SeT for vitrification of embryos using OPS is negligible if: (1) LN in the chambers is frequently replaced and the chambers are disinfected between embryo donors, and (2) the protective straws (0.5-mL, AI) are applied over OPS and are properly sealed. These straws should be used without a cotton plug. However, the obtained results should be not extrapolated to other means of so-called 'sterile' methods of vitrification without specific testing.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».