MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2062057939 · doi:10.1353/nin.2012.0023

Don’t Give Me No Lip: The Cultural and Religious Roots of Leo Durocher’s Competitiveness

2012· article· en· W2062057939 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeffrey Marlett

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCatholicism and Religious Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSociologyPsychologyAestheticsArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Don’t Give Me No LipThe Cultural and Religious Roots of Leo Durocher’s Competitiveness Jeffrey Marlett (bio) I come to play! I come to beat you! I come to kill you! Leo Durocher, Nice Guys Finish Last All the stories of steroids and scandals aside, the American cultural imagination retains its faith in “the church of baseball.” Narratives of religiosity pervade the scholarship surrounding baseball. For example, the sport’s preference for tradition and ritual, the faith the sport and its teams inspire in fans, and the “green cathedrals” of ballparks themselves. Baseball possesses its own cognoscenti, an intellectual elite who appraise the game’s more nuanced aspects. This tension between being an insider and an outsider within baseball recalls Ludwig Wittgenstein’s argument that religious language resembles a kind of game. With both endeavors one learns by playing the game (or practicing the religion). Only later does intellectual affirmation provide new levels of deeper meaning. But what about the dark side? Almost all religions possess some notion of evil; the dualistic Other serves several purposes: temptation, damnation, and an instructive place in narrative lessons about what not to do. Joseph Price writes, “Classically, the dualistic, cosmic conflict pits the forces of good against the forces of evil, light against darkness, creation against chaos, or it presents the Gnostic tension between flesh and spirit.”1 Baseball is no different; the 1919 Black Sox, Pete Rose, and now perhaps Barry Bonds and Mark McGwire stand as instructive examples of the harm baseball suffers when its practitioners sacrifice ultimate reward and salvation for short-term monetary gain and glory. Then there’s Leo Durocher (1905–91), the many times married and divorced manager of the Dodgers and Giants who coined the phrase “nice guys finish last.” Durocher’s infamy in baseball enjoys many sources—and just as many [End Page 43] scriptural accounts. Rumors swirled about his rookie-year pilfering of Babe Ruth’s watch (untrue stories Ruth himself fueled out of dislike for Durocher).2 In every city Durocher played (New York, St. Louis, Cincinnati, Brooklyn), he rang up eye-popping gambling debts and often bounced checks when paying them off or buying fancy clothing. When not playing shortstop with grace and speed (albeit with a weak .247 batting average), Durocher ran around with a shady group of gangsters, Hollywood grafters, and pool hustlers. More than once he ended a ball game fighting with fans. These troubles followed Durocher throughout his baseball career. In 1947 things grew so bad that the Brooklyn Catholic Youth Organization (CYO) protested by withdrawing its numerous members from the Dodgers’ Knothole Gang. Frank Murphy, a US Supreme Court justice, and Westbrook Pegler, a widely-read columnist, also joined the rush to squelch Durocher’s style. Decades later, he was still at it, grinding away at his players and chasing women. What really set Durocher apart, though, was his mouth. He stands as one of the greatest examples of a baseball “bench jockey.” His nickname “the Lip” came from Babe Ruth, frustrated with the younger Durocher’s inability to refrain from back talk. Baseball always held a role for verbal harassment of the other team, but Durocher took the role to unknown heights. Durocher yapped at everybody—off the field as well as on it. Jonathan Eig writes, “If Durocher spoke a sentence without curses, it was probably an accident, soon to be corrected. . . . Nowhere did he stay out of trouble, and nowhere did he shut up.”3 As a player, Durocher spouted off to everyone, including the game’s greats like Ty Cobb. When Detroit’s Bob “Fatty” Fothergill came to bat against the Yankees, the rookie Durocher brazenly called time from his shortstop position. Durocher ran in to the umpire protesting that Detroit was batting out of order. When informed that Fothergill was indeed the correct batter, Durocher responded flippantly that he had mistaken Fothergill’s girth for two players. Infuriated, Fothergill promptly grounded out on the next pitch. Durocher played for four teams (Yankees, Reds, Cardinals, and Dodgers) from 1928 to 1945, and eventually managed four more (Dodgers, Giants, Cubs, and Astros). His managing career finally ended in 1973. During his tenure...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,054
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,108

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,009
Communication savante0,0080,003
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,223 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetCatholicism and Religious StudiesTravaux en français237 207