Injection in Shale: Review of 15 Years Experience on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) and Implications for the Stimulation of Unconventional Reservoirs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Injection in shale with matrix permeability in the nano-Darcy range and without the presence of any permeable layers has been performed for over 15 years on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, for the purpose of cuttings and waste fluids re-injection. The review of this experience shows that, in the early days, many cases of unconfined injection occurred through the vertical propagation of hydraulic fractures over 3000 feet distance that sometimes led to leakages to the seafloor after only a few thousands of barrels had been injected. For avoidance of this, some Operators – e.g. ConocoPhillips Norway – developed techniques allowing wells to dispose of several million barrels into individual shale domains, in safe confined-conditions, with vertical propagation of the disposal domain less than 1000 feet above the injection point. In the case of Ekofisk, this confinement is established by a careful selection of the injection interval and location, a detailed analysis of the injection records and dedicated monitoring programs. Recently, usage of frequent 4D interpretations of seismic surveys shot over a permanent sensor array placed on the seafloor above the field allowed a detailed domain-mapping and independent dynamic-monitoring. The paper focuses on the detailed analysis of those later cases and demonstrates their success from the use of comprehensive field data, which were obtained by the creation of a massively-fractured domain around the injection point – i.e. a conjunction of induced fractures and the opening of pre-existing natural fractures. The analysis of hundreds of pressure fall-off examples shows that the permeability height product (kh) of the shale rock-mass around the injection point reaches several Darcy feet – i.e. orders of magnitude more than during shale reservoir stimulation. One of the cases presented in the paper is used to show how the injection confinement was achieved and how the permeability around the injection zone developed as a function of the injected volume. It shows that after injecting about 10 thousand barrels, the permeability height product (kh) around the injection zone already reached several Darcy feet. The mechanisms responsible for the blockage of the propagation of the primary hydraulic fracture and the diversion of the fluid into secondary and tertiary fractures are clearly indentified and quantified. The paper indicates how safe, secured and controlled injection in shale can be achieved, as opposed to the unconfined cases of the early history on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. It also shows that while maintaining safety and vertical-confinement, massive increase of permeability of nano-Darcy shale rock-masses can be achieved. Both results are extremely important when it comes to cuttings injection in shale. Even more importantly, the paper discusses the implications of these results to the hydraulic stimulation of shale reservoirs in terms of both safety and efficiency. First, the permeability increases observed during cutting re-injection in the Ekofisk area can be set as realistically-achievable goals during shale reservoir stimulation.Second, the identification of the mechanisms having led to this development can be used to adapt current stimulation techniques to reach such permeability-increase goals.Finally, the techniques presented in the paper can be used to ensure the vertical confinement of future stimulation jobs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».