First Report of a New Postharvest Disease of Pear Fruit Caused by <i>Sphaeropsis pyriputrescens</i> in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A survey of stored d'Anjou pears was conducted in British Columbia (BC), Canada in January 2006 to determine if Sphaeropsis rot was present in BC as had been reported previously for apples and pears in Washington (1,2). Sphaeropsis pyriputrescens Xiao & J.D. Rogers produces decay similar to Botrytis cinerea that originates from the stem or calyx end. Of 3,614 pears sampled, 55 (1.5%) had symptoms similar to those described for Sphaeropsis rot. Isolations were made from each infected pear onto acidified potato dextrose agar (APDA) dishes and incubated at 20°C for 5 to 7 days. Twenty-seven cultures resembling S. pyriputrescens were induced to produce pycnidia by exposing them to 12-h cycles of alternating light and dark periods at 20°C (1). Conidia extracted from pycnidia were then streaked onto PDA dishes and incubated at 20°C for 12 to 24 h from which single-spore cultures were made. These isolates developed a dense, white-to-cream mycelium that turned yellow over time; black pycnidia were formed on the culture dishes after 4 weeks. Conidia were brown, clavate to subglobose to irregular, and similar in size (16 × 10 μm) to previous descriptions (1). Identification of S. pyriputrescens was confirmed by using DNA sequence data from the β-tubulin and ribosomal genes. Sequences from S. pyriputrescens from Washington (1) were compared with those from BC, Canada. Isolates from Canada shared 99 to 100% sequence homology with those from Washington. Two of the BC isolates (DAOM 238917 and 238918) were deposited in the Canadian Culture Collection, Ottawa, ON and their corresponding sequences were placed in the GenBank database (NCBI, Bethesda, MD) with accession nos. EU156037 and EU156040 (ribosomal gene) and EU156048 and EU 156050 (β-tubulin gene), respectively. Five isolates from different locations in BC and two isolates from Washington were tested for pathogenicity on d'Anjou pears and four apple cultivars (Ambrosia, Fuji, Gala, and Granny Smith). Plugs (3 mm in diameter) removed from 2-week-old cultures were placed into two corresponding wounds on each of five fruit per cultivar. The fruit were then placed at 1 or 20°C for 22 or 7 days, respectively, when the diameters of the decay areas were recorded. All isolates were pathogenic on pears (P = <0.05). Decay lesion diameter was greater at 1°C, ranging from 46.8 to 57.9 mm, than at 20°C, ranging from 32.6 to 44.2 mm. All BC isolates were also pathogenic on the fruit of each apple cultivar (P = <0.05), although at 20°C, decay areas were smaller than on pears, and at 1°C, very little rot developed. Koch's postulates were completed by reisolating S. pyriputrescens from the inoculated pears and apples and identifying the isolates as above. Although S. pyriputrescens was only observed on pears in BC, research in Washington indicates that it is a more serious problem on apples (2). To our knowledge, this is the first documented report of the occurrence of S. pyriputrescens in Canada. References: (1) C. L. Xiao and J. D. Rogers. Plant Dis. 88:114, 2004. (2) C. L. Xiao et al. Plant Dis. 88:223, 2004.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».