MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2062558742 · doi:10.2118/2007-183

Heavy Oil-in-Water Emulsion as a Novel Sealant in the Near Well Bore Region

2007· article· en· W2062558742 sur OpenAlex
K. Zeidani, M. Polikar, Hongbin Huang, James Ellsworth Boyd

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueDrilling and Well Engineering
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSealantEmulsionPetroleum engineeringMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyComposite materialEngineeringChemical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract This experimental study was designed to provide a detailed understanding of the blocking mechanism of heavy oil-in-water emulsions injected into a porous medium. The process in mind is one where a created emulsion will break near the well bore or at some pre-determined distance from it, in order to provide an effective, stable plug against, for instance, water or gas coning. Well-characterized heavy oil-in-water emulsions were injected into micro-models and their behavior was recorded in visualization experiments. The effect of droplet-to-pore size ratio, droplet stability, and surfactant type and concentration were studied. It was observed that blockage took place because of size exclusion. Droplets may coalesce and produce a larger droplet due to the local high shear rate or to surfactant adsorption on the porous medium. Also, emulsion droplet size distribution, emulsion viscosity and oil/water interfacial tension increased as the surfactant content decreased, resulting in higher capillary pressure across the trapped droplets. The effect of oil type, rock permeability, injection velocity, and wettability alteration were also studied. The experiments showed that an oil-in-water emulsion was effective in sealing unconsolidated cores for long periods of time. Emulsions carrying more viscous oils could resist higher pressures. Also, conditioning the medium with pre-flush solutions predictably affected the depth to which an emulsion may penetrate into a porous medium. Surfactant and alkaline based pre-flush solutions may enhance an emulsion penetration depth significantly. However, the emulsion may break down and emplace at a desired depth as a result of using low pH solutions. A novel sealant that uses heavy oil-in-water emulsion to block the near well bore matrix has been developed. Stable reduction in permeability to other fluids was observed as the plug withstood 42,500 kPa/m (about 1,800 psi/ft) pressure gradients. Criteria are defined for field application of this blockage phenomenon. Introduction An emulsion is a dispersion of two mutually insoluble liquids, such as water and oil. One of these two components is present in the form of finely dispersed spherical droplets in the second, which is the continuous phase. If oil is dispersed in water, the emulsion is referred to as an oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion which has a lower viscosity than the oil constituents; the reverse case is a water-in-oil emulsion (W/O). Emulsions can be encountered in almost all phases of oil production and processing [1 – 3]. Most of the world's crude oil is produced in emulsion form because natural emulsifiers exist in petroleum reservoirs. These natural emulsifiers, found in (heavy) crude oil, can be formed from asphaltenes, asphaltic and resinous materials, oil-soluble organic acids such as naphthenic acids, fatty acids or aromatic acids, or cyclic compounds (cyclic aromatics) such as toluene, benzene, decalin, methylcyclohexane, and cyclo-octane. Also, emulsions can be formed in-situ in many enhanced oil recovery processes such as chemical flooding, carbon dioxide flooding, steam flooding and fire flooding. Many laboratory studies [4 – 14] have been conducted to understand both the qualitative and the quantitative behavior of mulsions and their flow mechanisms through porous media.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,208
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,980

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,196 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle