Self management training in refractory angina
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Refractory angina pectoris is a major clinical problem characterised by unremitting symptoms of angina (equivalent to severity score class III-IV on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification), which are resistant to conventional treatments including nitrates, calcium channel and β adrenoceptor blockade, percutaneous coronary interventions, and coronary artery bypass grafting.1 Although there are limitations in current surveillance systems worldwide, estimates from data on revascularisation and hospital admission suggest a prevalence of refractory angina somewhere between 600 000 and 1.8 million in the United States and an incidence of 30-50 000/year in continental Europe.1 2 Patients with refractory angina experience persistent anginal pain, poor general health status, psychological distress, restriction of activity, and inability to self manage their symptoms—all of which have a negative effect on health related quality of life.1 2 Self management training that includes cognitive behaviour techniques is showing promise in angina.3 4 Indeed, it could be a welcome standard addition to the current technically based effective interventions aimed solely at reducing ischaemia.1 2 Among the most feasible, well established, and widely used therapeutic options at present are neuromodulation techniques such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and spinal cord stimulation.1 2 These techniques can relieve anginal pain secondary to reducing ischaemia. Their anti-ischaemic effect is probably a product of decreased myocardial oxygen consumption,1 although amelioration of coronary blood flow and neurohormonal mechanisms may also contribute.5 Spinal cord stimulation can also significantly improve health related quality of life.6 Invasive analgesic strategies, such as stellate ganglion blockade and thoracic epidural analgesia, are also an important part of the current armamentarium.1 2 7 These treatments are expensive, however, and they require specialist angina centres with the requisite surgical and technical expertise. For example, one technique—enhanced external counterpulsation—involves application of a series of pneumatic cuffs that sequentially compress the calves and thighs.8 It reduces anginal symptoms and the need to use nitrates, and it improves time to exercise induced ischaemia, but a typical treatment regimen comprises more than 30 treatment sessions of one hour over the course of several weeks.8 Self management training is a promising adjunct to the treatment of refractory angina that needs relatively few resources, but few studies have been carried out in this patient population. Self management training interventions are multimodal treatment packages that use learning materials and cognitive behaviour strategies to promote effective self management of disease. In the past decade, a few small self management trials have shown significant reductions in the frequency of angina symptoms, use of nitrates, stress, and aspects of self reported health related quality of life.3 While these findings are promising, they come from trials in single sites that have short term follow-up (three to six months); methodological problems such as small sample sizes, lack of standardised and replicable interventions, and heterogeneity of measures. These trials have also included patients with less severe Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I-II symptoms. All of these factors limit the interpretation and generalisability of the findings.3 A more recent and robust trial with 142 participants showed that a self management programme based on cognitive behaviour therapy significantly reduced anxiety, depression, frequency of symptoms, nitrate use, and physical limitations (P<0.05) at six months compared with usual care.4 This model was designed and tested for patients with newly diagnosed angina, and this research should be adapted and tested for patients with refractory angina. Investing time and money in robust trials of self management in refractory angina could be worthwhile. Rigorous trials of patients with other complex diseases have accrued overwhelming evidence for the feasibility, long term effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and widespread dissemination of self management interventions led by healthcare professionals and peers.9 10 11 12 For example, self management training significantly improves health related quality of life in patients with complex chronic pain,9 arthritis,10 and other chronic illnesses.11 Significant reductions in rates of admission to hospital, length of hospital stay, mean number of visits to doctors, and direct out of pocket costs to patients have also been consistently reported.10 11
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».