Notice bibliographique
Résumé
When it comes to mating, it seems that you're damned if you do, and damned if you don't. Mating can transmit diseases, and mating partners might even injure or kill one another. Yet, for most animals, mating is necessary for reproduction, and mating with multiple partners can increase the number or quality of offspring. In this complicated world, what is the best strategy for maximizing the benefits while minimizing the costs of mating?As it turns out, the situation is even more complicated for female red flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum): the costs and benefits of different mating strategies are dependent on environmental conditions. Red flour beetles have been maintained in the laboratory at 30°C for over 30 years, which amounts to over 350 beetle generations, so these beetles are well adapted to life at 30°C. However, life at 34°C is significantly more stressful for the beetles, so how do the relative costs and benefits of different mating strategies change at a stressful temperature? Vera Grazer and Oliver Martin, from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, decided to address this question by measuring the survival and reproductive success of female red flour beetles at different temperatures.The researchers placed individual female beetles into small enclosures alone (virgin females that did not invest in reproduction), with a single male beetle (monogamous females that invested in reproduction with a single mate), or with multiple male beetles (polyandrous females that invested in reproduction with multiple mates) at both 30 and 34°C. After 1 week, the researchers removed the males from the enclosures, and monitored the females for an additional 9 weeks to assess their long-term survival, and to count the number of larvae that hatched for each female. Using this method, Grazer and Martin were able to quantify both the survival and reproductive success of females at both temperatures.The duo found that at the standard 30°C temperature, the virgin red flour beetles had the highest survival, with intermediate survival in the monogamous beetles, and the lowest survival in the polyandrous beetles. In other words, at the red flour beetle's adapted temperature, reproduction became increasingly costly for the females as the number of mates rose. The team also found that at 30°C there was no difference in the number of larvae produced by monogamous and polyandrous beetles. Therefore, at the standard temperature, it is clear that mating with multiple males carries a survival cost and does not confer any reproductive benefits for females.However, at 34°C, the survival differences disappeared. All of the ‘hot’ females survived for a reduced length of time relative to the beetles held at 30°C, and all of the ‘hot’ females survived for the same length of time, regardless of whether they were virgins, monogamous or polyandrous. What was even more exciting was that at 34°C the polyandrous beetles produced more larvae than monogamous beetles. Therefore, mating with multiple males does not carry an additional survival cost at higher temperatures, and results in increased reproductive success for female red flour beetles.This experiment elegantly demonstrates that both the costs and the benefits of polyandry are dependent on environmental conditions for female red flour beetles. As climate change and anthropogenic activity increases, wild populations are faced with rapid environmental change and environmental conditions that are quite different from those that populations are adapted to. The results of Grazer and Martin's experiment therefore have wide-reaching implications for wild populations across the globe. In this changing world, mating strategies will need to adapt.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».