The HAIL platform for big health data
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Big data analytics in health is an emerging area due to the urgent need to derive actionable intelligence from the large volumes of healthcare data to efficiently manage the healthcare system and to improve health outcomes. In this paper we present a ‘big’ healthcare data analytics platform—termed as Healthcare Analytics for Intelligence and Learning (HAIL)—that is an end-to-end healthcare data analytics solution to derive data-driven actionable intelligence and situational awareness to inform and transform health decision-making, systems management and policy development. The innovative aspects of HAIL are: (a) the integration of data-driven and knowledge-driven analytics approaches, (b) a sand-box environment for healthcare analysts to develop and test health policy/process models by exploiting a range of data preparation, analytical and visualization methods, (c) the incorporation of specialized healthcare data standards, terminologies and concept maps to support data analytics, and (d) text analytics to analyze unstructured healthcare data. The architecture of HAIL comprises the following four main modules (fig 1): (A) Health Data Integration module that entails a semantics-based metadata manager to synthesize health data originating from a range of healthcare institutions to formulate a rich contextualized data resource. The data integration is achieved through ETL workflows designed by health analysts and researchers, (B) Health Analytics Module provides a range of healthcare analytics capabilities including, (i) Exploratory Analytics using data mining to perform data clustering, classification and association tasks, (ii) Predictive Analytics to predict future trends/outcomes derived from past observations of the healthcare processes, (iii) Text Analytics to analyze unstructured texts (such as clinical notes, discharge summaries, referral notes, clinical guidelines, etc.), (iv) Simulation-based Analytics to simulate what-if questions based on simulation models, (v) Workflow analytics to interact with modeled clinical workflows to understand the affects of various confounding factors, (vi) Semantic Analytics to infer contextualized relationships, anomalies and deviations through reasoning over a semantic health data model, and (vii) Informational Analytics to present summaries, aggregations, charts and reports, (C) Data Visualization Module offers a range of interactive data visualizations, such as geospatial visualizations, causal networks, 2D and 3D graphs, pattern clusters and interactive visualizations to explore high dimensional data, (D) Data Analytics Workbench is an interactive workspace to enable data health analysts to specify and set-up their analytics process in terms of data preparation, selection and set-up of analytical methods and the selection of visualization methods. Using the workbench analysts can design sophisticated data analytics workflows/models using a range of data integration, analytical and visualization methods. The HAIL platform is available via a web portal and the desktop application, and it is deployed on a cloud infrastructure. HAIL can be connected with existing health data sources to provide front-end data analytics. Fig 2 shows the technical architecture. The HAIL platform has been applied to analyze a real-life clinical healthcare situations using actual data from the provincial clinical data warehouse. We will present two case studies of the use of HAIL. In conclusion, the HAIL platform addresses a critical need for healthcare analytics to impact health decision-making, systems management and policy development.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,021 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,037 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».