Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Conventional Measurement While Drilling (MWD) systems and mud motors have been the preferred method used to drill horizontal and directional wells. Although this method has been proven on thousands of wells it has also shown inefficiencies. The process of slide drilling can lead to undesirable doglegs, hole cleaning problems, reduced weight to the bit, etc. Rotary steerable technology has undergone a significant transformation in recent years and is quickly becoming not only a viable alternative to mud motors but in some cases standard practice. Phoenix markets and services a rotary steerable system called the Well Director Automatic Directional Drilling System. This paper will discuss rotary steerable technology as a whole then focus in on the Well Director. The Well Director is in the final stages of becoming a commercially viable drilling tool. Mechanical, Hydraulic and Data Transmission methods for the tool will be included. A discussion of trials and tribulation will follow with an emphasis on going forward and the advantages the tool represents to operators namely faster, smoother and more accurate well bores drilled further than ever before. Introduction Directional drilling continues to be an essential tool for the oil and gas producer. Wells drilled either directionally or horizontally in Canada continue to represent a significant percentage of total wells drilled. Environmental issues depleted production zones and landowner conflicts are on the rise and therefore increase the need to drill directionally or horizontally. Percentage of Hz/Dir Wells vs. Total Wells vs. % of Wells Drills (Available in full paper) Steerable mud motors have been the preferred method used to drill horizontal and directional wells. Although this method has been proven on thousands of wells it has also shown inefficiencies. For example we can expect to see upwards of a 50% decrease in the rate of penetration (ROP) while sliding1 as opposed to rotary drilling. A relatively new technology has been developed to improve upon the inefficiencies associated with steerable mud motor drilling. Rotary Steerable Tool technology is quickly becoming an economically viable and technologically superior alternatives to steerable mud motor drilling. Rotary Steerable Tool Technology is the process of continually rotating the drill string while at the same time steering the bit toward a pre-determined target. This technology has been designed to combine both a mud motor and a MWD into one compact drilling system. Well Director ® Phoenix Technology Services LP (Phoenix) has entered into an agreement to market and service a Rotary Steerable Tool called the Well Director ®Automatic Directional Drilling System. This tool has been operated in over one hundred wells for the mining industry in Europe over the past fifteen years. Recent technical advancements have allowed this tool to become commercially viable for the oil and gas directional market. The Well Director consists of two main components, refer to figure 1. The first being the rotating mandrel, this runs through the center of the tool and is in constant rotation when the tool is operating.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,007 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».