MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2062968200 · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00637.x

Practical aims to maintain neonatal resuscitation skills

2001· letter· en· W2062968200 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
DI Tudehope, Marcin Osuch

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health · 2001
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineNeonatal resuscitationResuscitationChristian ministryTrainerCompetence (human resources)IntubationMedical emergencyObservational studyCardiopulmonary resuscitationMedical educationEmergency medicineSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In this issue of the Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, Boo and Pong1 report the results of a prospective observational study of the dissemination of a neonatal resuscitation program in Malaysia. In Malaysia, a train-the-trainer model was used where trainees become instructors running training courses. Program funding, including the purchase of mannequins, intubation heads and resuscitation equipment was borne by the Ministry of Health. The course was modelled on the format of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP), first developed by the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics in 1979 with frequent subsequent updates.2 Neonatal resuscitation programs are well established in the USA and Canada and taught in 25 countries worldwide. The Australian States and Territories are in their infancy in establishing NRP courses, however paediatric advanced life support courses have been successfully implemented for 5–10 years. The NRP contains an excellent education manual which follows a self-paced learning format. It begins with an introductory section including pathophysiology, followed by a series of lessons on the different activities associated with neonatal resuscitation.2 Each lesson building on the skills learnt in the previous one. Lessons include initial evaluation and management of newborns at risk, preparation and use of equipment for assisted ventilation, performance of chest compression and endotracheal intubation, and the use of drugs for severely ill infants. The goals of the NRP courses are that every newborn has a right to a resuscitation performed at a high level of competence. At least one person skilled in neonatal resuscitation should be in attendance at every delivery and an additional skilled person should be readily available if required. Appropriate equipment must be immediately available, well maintained and clinical staff must be familiar with its function. Finally, familiarity with the NRP will ensure that clinical staff will be capable of working effectively as a team. The universal problems of training courses, namely that the skills and training required for instructors, are not well defined and the retention of knowledge and skill, both for the provider and instructor, are not well documented. This was addressed in a systematic review of randomized trials.3 Boo and Pong stated that even though they reached their aim of training large numbers of clinical staff, the retention of skill and knowledge of some instructors was poor. There were less than four personnel per instructor a year, of whom many were not primarily involved in clinical neonatology.1 It was not possible to assess whether the introduction of the program had reduced perinatal mortality or morbidity. The introduction of a NRP has been documented to decrease neonatal mortality, hypothermia and meconium aspiration.4 The NRP emphasizes that the quicker the initial steps in resuscitation are, the less the need for CPR, intubation and medications. Most neonates respond to drying, warming, suctioning and tactile stimulation and over zealous and invasive resuscitation are unwarranted in most cases.5 Thorough suctioning of the nose, mouth and posterior pharynx before delivery of the body decreases the risk of meconium aspiration syndrome. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, with representation from Australia, New Zealand and four other countries, was formed in 1992 to provide a forum for liaison between resuscitation organizations in the developed world.6 Recognition and immediate resuscitation of a distressed neonate requires an organized plan of action and the immediate availability of equipment and of qualified personnel. Preparation for resuscitation needs the availability of skilled personnel and equipment, communication with clinicians and parents, appropriate environmental conditions, practice of standard precautions and a concept of integrated assessment. Special resuscitation planning is required for multiple birth, prematurity, meconium stained liquor and surgical conditions.7 The introduction of a structured Neonatal Resuscitation Program in delivery and operating suites results in decreased instances of hypothermia and meconium aspiration syndrome, and increased use of free oxygen and effective bag and mask ventilation with consequent decreased need for intubation and positive pressure ventilation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,026
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,088

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0260,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,322
Écart entre enseignants0,309 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Paediatrics and Child HealthMême sujetCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationTravaux en français237 207