Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pacific Anglicanism: Online Bibliographical Resources Terry M Brown (bio) In this brief report, I put forward the range of bibliographical resources about Pacific Anglican church history currently available, especially online. (The Internet addresses [urls] for the websites mentioned in this report are summarized in the appendix.) My relationship has been primarily with the Anglican Church of Melanesia (previously known as the Melanesian Mission, the Diocese of Melanesia, and the Church of Melanesia), with dioceses in Solomon Islands and Vanuatu/New Caledonia. However, the report also speaks to bibliographical resources concerning the Anglican Church in Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Tonga, Sāmoa, Norfolk Island, Pitcairn Island, and Hawai‘i. When I first came to Solomon Islands to teach at Bishop Patteson Theological Centre in 1975, I used resources available in the college library and briefly overlapped as staff with John Pinson, a priest-librarian-archivist who was working on a bibliography of publications of the Melanesian Mission Press and its heirs from 1855 to 1975. That bibliography, titled “How Can You Sing the Lord’s Song without a Book”—is now online at http://anglicanhistory.org/oceania/pinson_bibliography.pdf. It and Sally Edridge’s Solomon Islands Bibliography to 1980 (1985) are invaluable resources for Solomon Islands history. After fifteen years in Canada, I returned to Solomon Islands in 1996 as Anglican bishop of Malaita. In preparation for writing the chapter on the history of liturgy in the Anglican Church of Melanesia for the Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer: A Worldwide Survey (Hefling and Shattuck 2006), I returned to the college library only to discover that many of the books and pamphlets I had previously used were missing. Some of these I found in the archives of the Church of Melanesia (material up to 1975; John Pinson had also organized this collection), which [End Page 342] were on deposit in the National Archives of Solomon Islands in Honiara. I also discovered some material on the Anglican history website, Project Canterbury (www.anglicanhistory.org), which had been operating for a few years under the direction of its founder, a young Episcopal lay scholar, Richard Mammana. I wrote him, and we decided to develop an Oceania directory on the site. The result, about seven years later, is “Anglicanism in Oceania”—an extensive array of online resources on the Anglican Church in Solomon Islands, New Hebrides/Vanuatu, New Caledonia, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Sāmoa, Tonga, Norfolk Island, Pitcairn Island, and Hawai‘i (http://anglicanhistory.org/oceania/). The site includes many primary resources that are difficult to find in libraries as well as modern scholarly work such as doctoral dissertations by anthropologists working in Anglican communities in the Pacific. The whole Project Canterbury site continues to grow, is worldwide in scope, and tries to include all eras and theological traditions of Anglican/Episcopal practice, from Evangelical to Catholic. The site is very popular and has somewhere between 6 and 7 million hits per year. I am both an Episcopal patron and a contributing director, the latter in recognition of the sometimes tedious work of scanning fragile pages to make sure they endure and are widely available. US copyright law means that anything published before 1923 can be put online without restriction, but later material requires the permission of author and/or publisher. We have especially tried to include research by local Anglican scholars and private memoirs of Anglican missionaries, whether published or unpublished. However, the story does not quite end there. As I used the Church of Melanesia archives, I discovered that the finding guide did not correspond well with what was there. I had the frequent experience of asking archives staff for one item in the guide only to be told it was missing; then the next week, when I asked for something else, the missing item would surface. As I was moving toward retirement as diocesan bishop in August 2008, I proposed to the Council of Bishops that I stay on as a volunteer archivist for the Church of Melanesia, with a special focus on the pre-1975 collection. The bishops agreed for me to stay on for four years, 2009–2012. I then approached the director of the Solomon...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,013 | 0,034 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,391 | 0,217 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».