MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2063476700 · doi:10.1080/0891693021000026319

Experimental Model for Ophthalmopathy in BALB/c and Outbred (CD-1) Mice Genetically Immunized with G2s and the Thyrotropin Receptor

2002· article· en· W2063476700 sur OpenAlexafffund
Masayo Yamada, Audrey Wu Li, Kenneth A. West, Cheng-Hsien Chang, Jack R. Wall

Notice bibliographique

RevueAutoimmunity · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDalhousie University
Mots-clésThyrotropin receptorEndocrinologyThyroidAntibodyInternal medicineBALB/cTrabMolecular biologyBiologyImmunologyMedicineGraves' diseaseImmune system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In an attempt to develop an animal model for thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) we have genetically immunized BALB/c and outbred (CD-1) mice with cDNAs encoding the thyroid and eye muscle shared protein G2s and full length human thyrotropin receptor (TSHr). Firstly, BALB/c mice were immunized with cDNAs for G2s and the TSHr, alone or in tandem with cDNAs for interleukin (IL)4 or IL12. Control mice were immunized with empty vehicle only. Sera from the great majority of experimental mice contained antibodies against a G2s fusion protein and the flavoprotein (Fp) subunit of mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase, the "64 kDa protein", with the greatest levels being found at sacrifice (17 wk). Antibody levels in mice immunized with G2s + TSHr or G2s + IL12 were generally higher than those in mice immunized with G2s only. TSHr antibodies (TRAb), measured as TSH binding inhibition, were detected in only two mice. On histological examination of the orbits, mild edema, eye muscle fiber separation and mast cell infiltration in and around the eye muscles were found in the majority of experimental mice, but not in control mice. Splenocytes were transferred from selected G2s-immunized mice to normal syngeneic litter mates. None of the transfer mice had serum antibodies against G2s, Fp or TSHr but their orbital tissue showed the same degree of mast cell infiltration as primary mice. No major histological changes were observed in the thyroid or other skeletal muscle in either primary or transfer mice. Similar results were observed in CD-1 mice although, overall, the model was better expressed than in BALB/c mice. In these mice, serum anti-G2s antibody levels were not significantly different between the various experimental groups except at 16 wk, when they were slightly greater than in control animals. Anti-Fp antibodies were detected at 12, 14 and 16 wk, in all experimental groups, including those immunized with G2s only, and were greatest in mice immunized with TSHr alone. TRAb levels were greatest in mice immunized with both G2s and the TSHr in the presence of TL4, but not IL12. The finding of negative anti-G2s but positive anti-Fp antibodies in some CD-1 mice suggests that eye muscle damage and Fp release must have been mediated by T lymphocytes, rather than antibodies, targeting G2s or some other as yet unidentified cell membrane antigen. Histological changes in the orbit were similar to those observed in BALB/c mice although mast cell numbers were greater, in both primary and transfer mice. Overall, the greatest histological changes were observed in CD-1 mice immunized with both G2s + TSHr + IL4. None of the animals became overtly hyperthyroid or hypothyroid during the course of the study although several of the CD-1 mice had abnormal TSH or T4 levels. These results indicate that we have established a valid model for human ophthalmopathy using the novel thyroid and eye muscle expressed protein G2s, now recognized as a fragment of the winged-helix transcription factor Foxp1, and TSHr, and that G2s and the TSHr are both primary antigens in TAO. Reactivity against a TSHr-like protein may be the first event leading to ophthalmopathy in humans with TAO and experimental mice and eye muscle damage may result from autoimmunity against G2s and Fp as a result of "antigen spreading".

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,832
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,436

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,248
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations24
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAutoimmunityMême sujetGlaucoma and retinal disordersTravaux en français237 207