The role of health promotion in the transition of the Nordic welfare states
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The 6th Nordic Health Promotion Research Conference: The Role of Health Promotion in the Transition of the Nordic Welfare States was held in Gothenburg, Sweden in August 2009. The aim of the conference was to focus on and share results from ongoing Nordic as well as international research in health promotion. The conference themes reflected current aspects of changes in research and work within health promotion locally, nationally and internationally. The Nordic School of Public Health, NHV, hosted the conference. www.nhv.se/hpconference09. The Ottawa Charter (1986) and the seven principles of Rootman et al. (2001) were the guiding principles for the conference presentations [1–3]. The action means of the Ottawa Charter are to build healthy public policy, create supportive environments, strengthen community action, develop personal skills and re-orient health services. The seven key principles of Rootman et al. are empowerment, participation, holism, intersectorality, equitability, sustainability and multistrategy. In order to reach a greater audience both in the Nordic countries and outside some of the researchers who participated in the conference were asked to write scientific articles that covered the theme they presented at the conference. The results are in this Supplement to the Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. A way to understand health promotion is to look upon the research in the field. The action means from the Ottawa Charter are touched upon in the articles. Vallgarda and Ollila address the concepts of building of a healthy public policy and re-orientation of health services. Vallgarda concludes that there is no common Nordic political approach to public health, and Ollila argues that health in all policies is necessary and that implementation of intersectoral health policies in practice remains challenging. Thorlindsson speaks of multistrategy and argues for the necessity to develop a transdisciplinary approach that integrates various elements from different disciplines and various levels of analysis. Johansson and Tillgren discuss whether there are financial incentives of collaborating organizations and illustrate with two examples. Torp, Guldbergsson, Dahl, Fossa and Flotten address creating supportive environments and strengthening community action. Equitability is one of the seven principles of Rootman et al. and is a focus in the majority of the articles. It is also central in the papers of Edwards and Di Ruggiero, who conclude that it is necessary to examine the effect of historical, global and dynamic contextual influences on health inequities in population-based interventions; Povlsen, Fosse and Borup find that the concepts of inequity and inequality are used synonymously by Nordic authors. Abel, Fuhr, Bisegger, Ackerman Rau and the European Kidscreen group highlight three forms of capital, namely economic, social and cultural resources in adolescents’ health, and Due, Krolner, Rasmussen, Andersen, Damsgaard, Graham and Holstein present a model of pathways and mechanisms from adolescence to adult health inequalities. Health education is central within health promotion. Hauge and Hem focus on health promotion education developed into a Masters programme and analyze the Galway Consensus Conference Statement (GCCS) according to health, health promotion and health promotion ethics. They conclude that the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,058 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».