Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Gaston Miron was a poet and it is as a poet that he would wish to be remembered. He died on 14 December 1996 and his funeral was a state occasion. In May 1999, the Colloque des jeunes chercheurs europeens en litterature quebecoise honoured his memory in Genoa. The three principal speakers, Jacques Allard (Universite du Quebec a Montreal), Jacques Barrere (Centre culturel franco-italien Galliera) and Marie-Andree Beaudet (Universite Laval) severally paid their tributes. Marie-Andree Beaudet was Miron's partner in his last years and spoke sensitively of his contribution as a poet and thinker. The Hexagone publishing house marked its fortieth anniversary with a deluxe edition of l'Homme rapaille, revised and annotated by the author. Miron was co-founder of the Hexagone in 1953 and closely associated with it for thirty years. Prior to the 1994 edition, l'Homme rapaille had sold 65,000 copies since the first version of 1970. Why did this writer whose lifetime's creative output fills one slim volume receive the highest accolades in Canada and Europe? I offer here a personal evaluation of Gaston Miron's role in the emergence of a distinctive Quebec voice. I draw in part on a filmed interview with the poet made on 18 June 1986 by the Film Unit at the University of Birmingham. Such an evaluation is not simple. Miron did not always find it easy to express himself freely. He has analysed painfully and painstakingly the colonial complex which induces aphasia and self-depreciation, and which variously impedes selfdisclosure. In his published interviews he was sometimes encouraged to venture into areas or offer comments where he was uncomfortable and which did not reflect his true interests. My interview with Miron of June 1986 of about sixty minutes' duration is more in the nature of a conversation than other printed interviews. The result is that Miron is more verbose but more relaxed, less academic but no less profound. A transcript of the sound track might reveal some of the lack of polish but also the spontaneity of Miron's lengthy asides. But it is not true to say that the interview rambles or lacks shape. Looking back, I marvel at the freedom the producer, Paul Morby, gave me. I did not even submit a list of the questions I proposed to put to Miron. In addition, the producer could probably follow only with difficulty the conduct of the conversation, engaged as he was with directing his three cameras. He was certainly taken by surprise when Miron produced a harmonica and sang, played and danced vigorously with his feet. With little intervention from me, the interview holds together marvellously and grows organically in a way that we had only dimly foreseen. It differs from the interview first published in Maintenant which is a scholarly discussion of the language issue in Quebec. The June 1986 interview deals with Miron's strategy as a writer and is close to the poet's other published prose writings: 'Note d'un homme d'ici', 'Alienation delirante', 'Un long chemin', 'Ma bibliotheque ideale', 'Situation de notre poesie' and 'Notes sur le poeme et le non-poeme'.1 It has some affinity too with the luminous and elegant Les Signes de l'identite, Miron's speech at the presentation to him of the Prix Athanase-David in October 1983 and published in 1991. The marked difference between my interview and the prose listed here is that, although Miron had complained of the time of day (it was recorded late morning) and of not being too hopeful of what might come of it, there is much less emphasis on the pathology of the Quebec writer, the non-poeme, a greater sense of buoyancy and achievement and an eloquent tribute to those who have inspired him and to those he consistently calls 'les camarades'. Patricia Smart quotes, in English, words attributed to Miron which stress the collective nature of the Quebec enterprise: 'In order to flower, poetry needs a land, a space, a light, a milieu where it can put down roots and a great deal of friendship'. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».