MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2065263203 · doi:10.1542/pir.33-3-122

Encephalitis in the Pediatric Population

2012· review· en· W2065263203 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePediatrics in Review · 2012
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInfectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEncephalitisMedicinePopulationPediatricsVirologyEnvironmental healthVirus

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Management of encephalitis, which can be fatal, requires understanding of a broad range of causative agents, pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical syndromes, and outcomes.After completing this article, readers should be able to:The broad definition of the term “encephalitis,” that is, inflammation of the brain, necessitates acknowledgment of the enormous inclusivity of the topic. The most common interpretation of the term implies a direct invasion of the brain by an infectious pathogen, most commonly, viral, fungal, or parasitic. The topic also includes examples of meningitis mediated by bacteria or other agents, which can produce extrameningeal symptoms such as lethargy or seizures, in which case, the combined term “meningoencephalitis” is used.There are also many examples of encephalitis not due to direct central nervous system (CNS) infections. Inflammatory processes due to an acute or chronic illness can result in an acute immune-mediated encephalitis, such as acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), lupus cerebritis, and paraneoplastic syndromes. Agents or conditions that produce slowly progressive CNS symptoms, such as tertiary syphilis or “slow viruses” (the prion protein encephalopathies), also are considered examples of encephalitis. Table 1 lists only a limited number of the many pathogens and pathologic conditions that can cause either acute or subacute encephalitis. In this discussion, we will mainly address examples of acute encephalitis related to direct CNS infection and para-infectious processes involving the CNS. These examples embrace the major portion of the spectrum of disease presentation, course, and recovery, as well as mechanisms of cerebral injury.In addition to the taxonomic classification in Table 1, causes of infectious encephalitis often are grouped according to the most common methods of transmission. “Arboviruses” are those spread by insect vectors, such as West Nile virus (WNV) and the equine encephalitis group (both by mosquitoes). Zoonotic causes of encephalitis not spread by intermediary insect vectors include many of the parasitic infections (larva migrans) and rabies. Community-acquired encephalitides, such as enterovirus, adenovirus, and late-childhood herpesvirus infections, generally are spread by person-to-person contact. Vertically transmitted pathogens include neonatal herpes simplex (HSV), rubella virus, and cytomegalovirus, and likely many other viral agents. Vertical, symptomatic transmission of WNV has been well documented. Finally, sexual transmission is the major mechanism of infection for adult herpes simplex type 2 virus and HIV (which can produce an acute, often transient, meningoencephalitis in the absence of opportunistic infection).Iconic examples of parainfectious encephalitis in children include ADEM and acute cerebellar ataxia. Variants of these conditions, such as acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalitis and Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis, are reported primarily in adult and older adult populations. Parainfectious syndromes are differentiated in practice from acute infectious encephalitis based upon clinical history and a lack of supporting evidence for direct CNS invasion. In the case of ADEM, there is usually an antecedent illness or immunization, followed 2 to 30 days later by various focal neurologic symptoms, possibly accompanied by signs of meningeal irritation. The early presentation may be confused with acute infectious encephalitis, and some instances of each phenomenon may be categorized incorrectly. Lumbar puncture findings can be variable, ranging from normal to a mild or moderate lymphocytic pleocytosis with an elevated protein concentration. Acute cerebellar ataxia follows a similar course of antecedent illness, but with symptoms limited to the cerebellum (ataxia, nystagmus, and cerebellar dysarthria).Infectious, parainfectious, and primary inflammatory causes of encephalitis are typically considered mutually exclusive. However, the example of Mycoplasma-related encephalitis illustrates some difficulty in differentiating direct versus indirect mechanisms of CNS disease, and the magnitude of the topic. Although widely regarded as a parainfectious phenomenon with variable pathology, up to 2% of these patients have Mycoplasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which might indicate some direct CNS invasion. Mycoplasma is a prevalent pediatric illness and cause of encephalitis. One hundred and eleven of 1988 patients referred to the California Encephalitis Project (CEP) tested positive for Mycoplasma pneumoniae; 76% of those affected were pediatric patients. (1)(2)Epidemiological data on encephalitis is organized according to identified agent. The CEP was initiated in 1998 for the collection of epidemiological data and is the most comprehensive database to date. It includes all referred immunocompetent individuals over 6 months of age and all clinical presentations, including chronic and slowly progressive encephalitis. Criteria for inclusion include encephalopathy or ataxia, plus at least one clinical finding (fever, seizures, focal neurologic deficits, CSF pleocytosis, abnormal neuroimaging, or abnormal EEG). By using a combination of CSF PCR, nasopharyngeal/throat specimen viral isolation, and acute and convalescent paired sera, all patients receive testing for herpesviruses, arboviruses, enteroviruses, respiratory viruses, measles virus, Chlamydia species, and M pneumoniae. Between 1998 and 2005, 1,570 patients were enrolled. A confirmed or probable causative agent was identified in only 16% of cases. Of identifiable causes, 69% were viral, 20% bacterial, 8% noninfectious (ie, autoimmune disease), 7% prion protein, 3% parasitic, and 1% fungal. Extensive testing procedures still revealed no identifiable cause in 63% of patients. (3) Among the more prominent causes of viral encephalitis, HSV accounted for only 2.5% of the CEP cases; in contrast, HSV was identified in 5% of 322 pediatric patients with acute encephalitis seen in one series between 1994 and 2005. (4)Epidemics of infectious encephalitis have always attracted much media attention, such as the WNV outbreak first seen in the United States in New York City in 1999. Between 1999 and 2007, 1,478 pediatric cases of confirmed WNV infection occurred in the United States, of which 443 (30%) had neurologic involvement. Of those with neurologic symptoms, there were three fatalities. Overall, children accounted for only 4% of reported WNV infection cases, with an estimated median annual incidence of 0.07 per 100,000. The pediatric fatality rate contrasts favorably with the 12% mortality rate from the 1999 epidemic, in which the majority of symptomatic cases were elderly people. WNV is now an epidemiological risk factor throughout the contiguous United States and the Caribbean. (5) Although WNV remains the most commonly encountered arboviral encephalitis agent, California encephalitis viruses have the greatest proportion of pediatric symptomatic infections (88% of cases), and eastern equine encephalitis has the highest overall mortality rate of 42%.The importance of local epidemiological information and seasonality cannot be ignored. Many cases of viral encephalitis either occur in epidemics, display a clear seasonal predilection, or both. For example, enteroviruses are most often seen in spring and summer; arthropod-borne illnesses, in the summer and fall. Respiratory virus-mediated cases often are specific to fall and winter. These elements of conventional epidemiological wisdom, however, should be subordinate to locally observed trends, such as cases of H1N1 influenza encephalitis observed during an out-of-season epidemic.In contrast, ADEM tends to be more sporadically observed than many infectious causes, although population data in the United States have supported a winter-spring predilection for the condition. Recent data from Canada, however, failed to show this seasonality. (6) The inclusion criteria for ADEM strongly influences reported incidence, producing wide variations, with a range of 0.2 to 0.8 per 100,000 children in the United States and Canada, and 0.07 per 100,000 in Germany. Antecedent infectious illness or vaccination typically is identified in 50% to 75% of patients. Presenting symptoms are highly variable, as the range of reported incidences of any one neurologic symptom in pooled study data suggest. Outcomes statistics are similarly scattered, with a 57% to 89% reported rate of full recovery.Infectious agents and parainfectious processes are presumed to mediate their acute symptoms through any combination of postulated mechanisms listed in Table 2. Evidence is best for the causes of fatal cases, in which wholesale parenchymal destruction is usually identifiable at necropsy, including direct neuronal and glial invasion with apoptosis, neuronophagia, vascular occlusion leading to infarction, and secondary effects of cerebral edema.Evidence supporting largely immune-mediated mechanisms of injury (cytotoxic antibodies, cytokine effects, etc) is less direct, and more evident in parainfectious/inflammatory causes of encephalitis. In ADEM fatalities, perivenular lymphocytic infiltration with local myelinolysis is a hallmark finding on pathology specimens. (12) Evidence supporting the concept of antibody-mediated mechanisms derives mainly from the clinical efficacy of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and plasmapheresis in the treatment of ADEM. Demonstration of antibody targeting precise CNS molecules in human ADEM and other demyelinating disease cases is scarce, with poor concordance, even between individuals who have similar syndromes. Existing knowledge of autoantibodies targeting specific CNS molecules is derived mainly from experience with paraneoplastic syndromes in adults, eg, anti-Yo, anti-Hu, and anti-Purkinje cell antibodies. These mechanisms, however, produce subacute encephalitis or cerebellitis distinct from typical pediatric ADEM. Even in children with classic postinfectious cerebellitis, fewer than half display anti-Purkinje cell antibodies.The lack of routinely detectable autoantibody in parainfectious CNS disease is likely attributable to both the large number of causative infectious agents and the multiplicity of possible targeting mechanisms. The latter may include both molecular mimicry and abnormal handling of normally occurring cellular antigens. For example, an invading virus may manufacture proteins that share epitopes with normal human myelin (mimicry), or may produce enzymes that cleave or misfold normal host proteins into immunologically unrecognized forms. For example, vaccinia virus core protein kinase cleaves myelin basic protein.Even more difficult is the isolation of cytokine effects in producing CNS injury. Interleukins 6 and 8, interferon γ, and tumor necrosis factor α seem to be among those cytokines most commonly identified as correlating with severity of disease course or outcomes across multiple causes of encephalitis, both infectious and noninfectious (eg, lupus cerebritis), but with high variability between specific agents. High concentrations of interleukins 6 and 8 can be found in the CSF of patients with Mycoplasma encephalitis and Japanese encephalitis. Higher titers in a small number of Japanese encephalitis patients seemingly correlated with a lower survival rate. It is unclear if cytokines are causative of further CNS injury or are active markers of disease severity.The typical presentation of acute encephalitis consists of any combination of altered mental status, seizures, other behavioral changes, weakness, sensory disturbances, or nonepileptic movement disorders, in the absence of an identifiable external cause, such as intoxication, traumatic brain injury, or psychosocial stressors. In the younger child or infant, symptoms may be even less distinct, and can include uncharacteristic somnolence, disinterest in feeding, weak suck, irritability, loss of head control, or abnormal eye movements. Further clinical clues may include the presence of fever (either acutely or in the 1–4 week interval before the onset of symptoms), or meningeal irritation (Table 3). However, these supporting clues may not be apparent upon first presentation. Because the clinical symptoms of encephalitis include a very broad range in both scope and severity, suspicion should be high in the approach to any child presenting with uncharacteristic behavior that is persistent and disproportionate to environmental and situational factors.Upon identification of a suspected case of encephalitis, a relatively short but critical series of steps should be executed, as summarized in Table 4. Additional facts to consider in the initial evaluation of the patient include seasonal presentation, history of immunosuppression, travel history, recent local epidemiological information, and presence of focal neurologic symptoms or deficits. Table 5 lists additional specific testing that should be routinely considered based upon protocols developed for the CEP and specific clinical settings. Table 6 lists, according to clinical clues, other viral causes of encephalitis that would require agent-specific testing if suspected.In patients in whom a parainfectious process is suspected, acute testing for demyelinating inflammatory conditions is increasingly popular. This testing is motivated by the increasing recognition of pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and other demyelinating conditions, eg, neuromyelitis optica (Devic disease), which may be mistaken initially for ADEM. Signs that increase suspicion for MS-related conditions include the presence of exclusively white matter abnormalities on MRI (especially if monolesional), optic neuritis, isolated myelitis, a recurrent or polyphasic disease course, or postadolescent age. In these cases, standard lumbar puncture studies also include myelin basic protein assay and measurement of CSF immunoglobulins with oligoclonal banding, and concomitant serum protein electrophoresis. Although the presence of disproportionate oligoclonal antibody production within the CSF is more suggestive of idiopathic demyelination (eg, MS), this finding is not sufficiently specific to prove a diagnosis of MS because ADEM and other CNS inflammatory conditions, including CNS infection, can produce similar results. The neuromyelitis optica antibody often is present in cases having optic neuritis associated with spinal cord symptoms. Documented neuromyelitis optica antibody-positive patients also have presented with optic neuritis only.In following the standard evaluation of patients with symptoms of encephalitis, the diagnostic testing results most commonly encountered include either unremarkable or variable leukocytosis or lymphocytosis. Comprehensive metabolic panels often fail to demonstrate specific abnormalities. Some enteroviral infections can produce a sepsislike syndrome with more remarkable hematologic abnormalities. Neonatal HSV infections sometimes produce hepatic function abnormalities and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone can be seen in almost any encephalitic process, but is reported more commonly in St Louis encephalitis (primarily a disease of the elderly population) and WNV infections.Understanding clinical-anatomic correlations may be helpful in refining the differential diagnosis, because some causes of encephalitis display tropism for specific CNS tissues. Table 3 describes the cardinal symptoms of infection or inflammation in major anatomic subdivisions, as well as commonly used clinical terms. Although the anatomic localization is an important part of initial symptom recognition, neuroimaging plays an indispensable role, whether or not localizing clinical symptoms are present. In the very young child, clinically based neuroanatomic localization also can be notoriously difficult. Table 7 describes some classically cited agent-specific localization-related findings, identifiable by symptoms, neuroimaging, or both. However, a high degree of variability in clinical presentations mandates that the search for an etiologic agent cannot be confined strictly to those agents classically injurious to specific CNS including early in the course of disease may sometimes results. For other than cerebral or generally is not for the diagnostic of lumbar puncture is the most for the diagnosis of encephalitis. The primary however, generally lack and can be normal early in the course of the In those patients abnormal CSF the most findings are normal or elevated protein normal and pleocytosis, which often with and to or sometimes with of the Although there are reported on this with etiologic agents, such as hemorrhagic pleocytosis with with virus, or with or infection, there are no CSF findings that to infectious cases of to of viral has to the lumbar puncture in encephalitis. This however, requires clinical suspicion of a specific diagnostic and is not as a broad of viral often is not in of For example, 5% to of adult cases of HSV meningitis have results upon the first results often are not and can from 1 to 7 days or to be the to specific or such as for suspected HSV is still largely upon clinical encephalitis such as ADEM or acute cerebellar ataxia may many of the CSF findings as infectious encephalitis. However, pleocytosis tends to be less in but not parainfectious cases. can be isolated from the the of a parainfectious or inflammatory most standard for of acute infectious encephalitis remains the of acute and convalescent serum A in immune globulin a suspected agent is most often considered This is limited by the of and the of testing Many patients are and to before convalescent titers are Of those the causative agent may be by clinical testing targeting other in the treatment of acute encephalitis is the of clinical and of inflammatory Because many patients present with any combination of seizures, and respiratory treatment of these acute symptoms often This should however, the suspicion of either an infectious or parainfectious and such patients are with intravenous for lumbar or for including HSV because of in these or because of the rate of testing of acute CSF many will the course of a on treatment of possible HSV encephalitis should not a search for clues to other causative agents. Table 5 lists some in the diagnosis of acute infectious encephalitis that might treatment the primary infectious ADEM as the most likely cause of an acute encephalitis. The of a infectious illness or an before the onset of symptoms, multiple encephalitic symptoms, and MRI abnormalities in both and white matter are highly suggestive not for the diagnosis of ADEM. from the approach to acute infectious encephalitis in that are a followed by or plasmapheresis in cases to The of both and plasmapheresis remains by clinical but has as an treatment at this of in the of infectious encephalitis remains of case the only evidence for their derives from the treatment of progressive a encephalitis by that primarily in of cerebral as or over 2 of is a critical in infectious encephalitis. is a variable finding in encephalitis. by is an important of In a series of children with meningitis or of patients with 3 of with at symptomatic and fluid are the most is used on a limited as case and small series However, the of is limited by the of with of the and the possible of active agents into the This may result in the of cerebral more fail and is isolated and small series to the of for treatment of symptomatic often a of in patients with encephalitis. In the of patients Of patients developed or This group of patients a mortality with an overall mortality rate for the agent has been used in the treatment of patients with acute symptomatic agents most are in intravenous and include agents and The typical approach with upon recognition of either recurrent or followed by of a more with to in some are still most commonly used but agents such as or are either high or fail to of or agent as the most likely including the of or this of usually is motivated both by the of in the patient and the to a as a of the of other are to the treatment either as intravenous or or other direct during the of the with and agents. The of is to both more as well as a more the of the agent However, metabolic can to of any or all agents in often are used as a treatment of of or has limited results as In the the of the the for full and outcomes of both infectious and inflammatory encephalitis range from full to The of clinical remains can be identified that strongly the for of the infectious agent or process, age of the of primary cerebral and spinal cord presence of cerebral of cerebral and vascular injury, presence of other system disease and and to treatment The importance of the of infectious disease in should not be This is in neonatal encephalitis accompanied by sepsislike syndromes, infectious or which may produce mortality Even among older disease as in the epidemics, in which the survival rate was among those in the acute of of is for of encephalitis In to this much upon the causative agent. a agents that produce more cerebral necrosis (especially if or brainstem injury is or vascular disease have statistics in The specific etiologic agent some for example, of patients who have HSV encephalitis some identifiable neurologic in some among children affected by had no detectable the encephalitis. for more even in cases there are no deficits, remains a topic. For example, of children 3 to 7 meningitis or encephalitis, 20% symptoms, with only 3% of The incidence of similar neurologic in other causes of encephalitis remains largely at this

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,964
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,076
Tête enseignante GPT0,381
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle